Primary stability and stiffness in ankle arthrodes—Crossed screws versus anterior plating

• Published in: Foot and ankle surgery Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 168 - 172
• Main Authors: Betz, Michael M., MD, Benninger, Emanuel E., MD, Favre, Philipp P, Wieser, Karl K, Vich, Magdalena M, Espinosa, Norman, MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: France Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2013
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ankle arthrodesis; Ankle Joint - physiopathology; Ankle Joint - surgery; Arthrodesis - instrumentation; Biomechanical comparison; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Plates; Bone Screws; Cadaver; Fixation techniques; Humans; Joint Instability - physiopathology; Joint Instability - surgery; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Prosthesis Design; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology; Biomechanical comparison; Ankle arthrodesis; Fixation techniques
• ISSN: 1268-7731; 1460-9584
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.04.006

Abstract Background Ankle arthrodesis is commonly used for the treatment of osteoarthritis or failed arthroplasty. Screw fixation is the predominant technique to perform ankle arthrodesis. Due to a considerable frequency of failures research suggests the use of an anatomically shaped anterior double plate system as a reliable method for isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis. The purpose of the present biomechanical study was to compare two groups of ankle fusion constructs – three screw fixation and an anterior double plate system – in terms of primary stability and stiffness. Methods Six matched-pairs human cadaveric lower legs (Thiel fixated) were used in this study. One specimen from each pair was randomly assigned to be stabilized with the anterior double plate system and the other with the three-screw technique. The different arthrodesis methods were tested by dorsiflexing the foot until failure of the system, defined as rotation of the talus relative to the tibia in the sagittal plane. Experiments were performed on a universal materials testing machine. The force required to make arthrodesis fail was documented. For calculation of the stiffness, a linear regression was fitted to the force–displacement curve in the linear portion of the curve and its slope taken as the stiffness. Results For the anatomically shaped double-plate system a mean load of 967 N was needed (range from 570 N to 1400 N) to make arthrodesis fail. The three-screw fixation method resisted a mean load of 190 N (range from 100 N to 280 N) ( p = 0.005). In terms of stiffness a mean of 56 N/mm (range from 35 N/mm to 79 N/mm) was achieved for the anatomically shaped double-plate system whereas a mean of 10 N/mm (range from 6 N/mm to 18 N/mm) was achieved for the three-screw fixation method ( p = 0.004). Conclusions Our biomechanical data demonstrates that the anterior double-plate system is significantly superior to the three-screw fixation technique for ankle arthrodesis in terms of primary stability and stiffness.