Recommendations for good practice in MS-based lipidomics

In the last 2 decades, lipidomics has become one of the fastest expanding scientific disciplines in biomedical research. With an increasing number of new research groups to the field, it is even more important to design guidelines for assuring high standards of data quality. The Lipidomics Standards...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of lipid research Vol. 62; p. 100138
Main Authors Köfeler, Harald C., Ahrends, Robert, Baker, Erin S., Ekroos, Kim, Han, Xianlin, Hoffmann, Nils, Holčapek, Michal, Wenk, Markus R., Liebisch, Gerhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2021
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the last 2 decades, lipidomics has become one of the fastest expanding scientific disciplines in biomedical research. With an increasing number of new research groups to the field, it is even more important to design guidelines for assuring high standards of data quality. The Lipidomics Standards Initiative is a community-based endeavor for the coordination of development of these best practice guidelines in lipidomics and is embedded within the International Lipidomics Society. It is the intention of this review to highlight the most quality-relevant aspects of the lipidomics workflow, including preanalytics, sample preparation, MS, and lipid species identification and quantitation. Furthermore, this review just does not only highlights examples of best practice but also sheds light on strengths, drawbacks, and pitfalls in the lipidomic analysis workflow. While this review is neither designed to be a step-by-step protocol by itself nor dedicated to a specific application of lipidomics, it should nevertheless provide the interested reader with links and original publications to obtain a comprehensive overview concerning the state-of-the-art practices in the field.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ISSN:0022-2275
1539-7262
DOI:10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100138