Research Note: Evaluating the roles of surface sanitation and feed sequencing on mitigating Salmonella Enteritidis contamination on animal food manufacturing equipment

• Published in: Poultry science Vol. 99; no. 8; pp. 3841 - 3845
• Main Authors: Muckey, Mary, Huss, Anne R., Yoder, Ashton, Jones, Cassandra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Inc 01.08.2020; Elsevier
• Subjects: Animal Feed - analysis; Animal Feed - microbiology; animal food; Animals; Chickens; feed manufacturing; Food Contamination - prevention & control; Food Handling - methods; Food Handling - standards; Immunology, Health and Disease; Poultry Diseases - transmission; Salmonella Enteritidis; Salmonella Infections, Animal - prevention & control; Sanitation - standards; Surface Properties; animal food; feed manufacturing; Salmonella Enteritidis
• ISSN: 0032-5791; 1525-3171
• DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.016

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of flushing surfaces with untreated feed vs. the use of 2 different dry chemical sanitizers on residual surface and feed Salmonella Enteritidis contamination. First, a Salmonella-negative batch of poultry feed was mixed in 9 laboratory-scale paddle mixers. A feed sample was collected, and targeted locations on surfaces within the mixer were swabbed to confirm Salmonella-negative. Next, a Salmonella-positive batch of poultry feed was mixed, sampled, and mixer surfaces swabbed. Mean Salmonella Enteritidis contamination across all 9 mixers were 3.63 cfu/g for sampled feed and 1.27 cfu/cm2 for surface contamination. Next, the mixers manufactured one of the following treatments (3 mixers/treatment): 1) none (control); 2) a commercially available essential oil blend; or 3) rice hulls treated with a 10% concentration of a propriety blend of medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA). After each treatment, each mixer manufactured another 2 batches of Salmonella-free feed (sequence 1 and sequence 2). Feed samples were collected, and surfaces were swabbed between each batch of feed. Manufacturing sequence (P < 0.0001) but not treatment (P > 0.05) impacted feed or surface contamination of Salmonella Enteritidis. There was Salmonella-positive residue in the batch of feed manufactured immediately after the positive control batch. However, no Salmonella residue was detected in batches of feed treated with either the commercial essential oil blend or MCFA. Low levels of Salmonella residue were observed from either feed (0.7 cfu/g for commercial essential oil blend) or surfaces (0.1 cfu/cm2 for MCFA) manufactured in sequence 1, but no residue was observed in sequence 2. These data suggest that sequencing of feed during manufacturing reduces Salmonella-positive contamination within animal food and on manufacturing surfaces, particularly after the second batch or with the use of chemical treatments.