Ramucirumab plus triplet chemotherapy as an alternative salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Ramucirumab is indicated for salvage treatment after failure of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the application of ramucirumab at later-line treatment in real-world practice has not received much discussion. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 70 patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Formosan Medical Association Vol. 121; no. 10; pp. 2057 - 2064
Main Authors Liang, Yi-Hsin, Liang, Jin-Tung, Lin, Ben-Ren, Huang, John, Hung, Ji-Shiang, Lai, Shuo-Lun, Chen, Tzu-Chun, Tsai, Jia-Huei, Cheng, Yung-Ming, Tsao, Ting-Han, Hsu, Wen-Ling, Chen, Kuo-Hsing, Yeh, Kun-Huei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Elsevier B.V 01.10.2022
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ramucirumab is indicated for salvage treatment after failure of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the application of ramucirumab at later-line treatment in real-world practice has not received much discussion. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 70 patients with mCRC who received ramucirumab plus chemotherapy at National Taiwan University Hospital between 2018 and 2019. Compared with those who received third- or later-line ramucirumab treatment, patients who received second-line ramucirumab treatment had significantly longer median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD; 6.7 vs 3.6 months, P = .004) and median overall survival (mOS; not reached vs 7.6 months, P = .009). Multivariate analyses revealed that second-line ramucirumab and triplet chemotherapy backbone were the only independent predictive factors for long mTTD and mOS. Patients who received ramucirumab with triplet chemotherapy had a significantly longer mOS than did patients who received ramucirumab with doublet chemotherapy (not reached vs 5.6 months, P = .002). Among those receiving second-line ramucirumab treatment, combination with triplet chemotherapy led to a longer mTTD than did combination with doublet chemotherapy, but the difference was non-significant (not reached vs 4.4 months, P = .108). By contrast, in patients receiving fourth- or later-line ramucirumab, combination with triplet chemotherapy led to significantly longer mTTD than did combination with doublet chemotherapy (8.0 vs 2.9 months, P = .032). Ramucirumab plus triplet chemotherapy may be an alternative regimen in patients with mCRC, particularly as a later-line treatment modality.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0929-6646
1876-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2022.02.019