Lost in translation: no effect of repeated optogenetic cortico-striatal stimulation on compulsivity in rats

• Published in: Translational psychiatry Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 315
• Main Authors: de Oliveira, Amanda R., Reimer, Adriano E., Simandl, Gregory J., Nagrale, Sumedh S., Widge, Alik S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 24.05.2021; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 13/109; 13/51; 631/378; 692/699/476; 9/30; Behavioral Sciences; Biological Psychology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosciences; Pharmacotherapy; Psychiatry
• ISSN: 2158-3188; 2158-3188
• DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01448-x

The orbitofrontal cortex–ventromedial striatum (OFC–VMS) circuitry is widely believed to drive compulsive behavior. Hyperactivating this pathway in inbred mice produces excessive and persistent self-grooming, which has been considered a model for human compulsivity. We aimed to replicate these findings in outbred rats, where there are few reliable compulsivity models. Male Long-Evans rats implanted with optical fibers into VMS and with opsins delivered into OFC received optical stimulation at parameters that produce OFC–VMS plasticity and compulsive grooming in mice. We then evaluated rats for compulsive self-grooming at six timepoints: before, during, immediately after, and 1 h after each stimulation, 1 and 2 weeks after the ending of a 6-day stimulation protocol. To further test for effects of OFC–VMS hyperstimulation, we ran animals in three standard compulsivity assays: marble burying, nestlet shredding, and operant attentional set-shifting. OFC–VMS stimulation did not increase self-grooming or induce significant changes in nestlet shredding, marble burying, or set-shifting in rats. Follow-on evoked potential studies verified that the stimulation protocol altered OFC–VMS synaptic weighting. In sum, although we induced physiological changes in the OFC–VMS circuitry, we could not reproduce in a strongly powered study in rats a model of compulsive behavior previously reported in mice. This suggests possible limitations to translation of mouse findings to species higher on the phylogenetic chain.