A High Bar or a Double Standard? Gender, Competence, and Information in Political Campaigns

This study seeks to determine whether subjects in two dynamic process tracing experiments react differently to information related to a candidate’s competence when that candidate is a woman, vs. when he is a man. I find that subjects evaluate a candidate whose competence is in doubt less favorably,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolitical behavior Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 301 - 325
Main Author Ditonto, Tessa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer Science + Business Media 01.06.2017
Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study seeks to determine whether subjects in two dynamic process tracing experiments react differently to information related to a candidate’s competence when that candidate is a woman, vs. when he is a man. I find that subjects evaluate a candidate whose competence is in doubt less favorably, and are less likely to vote for the candidate, when she is a woman. In general, evaluations of women seem to be influenced much more by information related to their competence than are evaluations of men. I also find that competence as portrayed by the composition of a candidate’s facial features does not alter this relationship. My findings suggest that gender-based stereotypes may have an indirect effect on candidate evaluations and vote choice by influencing how voters react to information about them.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0190-9320
1573-6687
DOI:10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5