A High Bar or a Double Standard? Gender, Competence, and Information in Political Campaigns
This study seeks to determine whether subjects in two dynamic process tracing experiments react differently to information related to a candidate’s competence when that candidate is a woman, vs. when he is a man. I find that subjects evaluate a candidate whose competence is in doubt less favorably,...
Saved in:
Published in | Political behavior Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 301 - 325 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer Science + Business Media
01.06.2017
Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study seeks to determine whether subjects in two dynamic process tracing experiments react differently to information related to a candidate’s competence when that candidate is a woman, vs. when he is a man. I find that subjects evaluate a candidate whose competence is in doubt less favorably, and are less likely to vote for the candidate, when she is a woman. In general, evaluations of women seem to be influenced much more by information related to their competence than are evaluations of men. I also find that competence as portrayed by the composition of a candidate’s facial features does not alter this relationship. My findings suggest that gender-based stereotypes may have an indirect effect on candidate evaluations and vote choice by influencing how voters react to information about them. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0190-9320 1573-6687 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5 |