The current role and future directions of imaging in failed back surgery syndrome patients: an educational review

• Published in: Insights into imaging Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 117
• Main Authors: Witkam, Richard L., Buckens, Constantinus F., van Goethem, Johan W. M., Vissers, Kris C. P., Henssen, Dylan J. H. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Vienna Springer Vienna 15.07.2022; Springer Nature B.V; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Artificial intelligence; Back surgery; Biomarkers; Diagnostic imaging; Diagnostic Radiology; Education; Educational Review; Etiology; Failed back surgery syndrome; Health services; Imaging; Internal Medicine; Interventional Radiology; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical diagnosis; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neuroradiology; Radiology; Signs and symptoms; Surgery; Ultrasound; Signs and symptoms; Diagnostic imaging; Failed back surgery syndrome; Magnetic resonance imaging; Artificial intelligence
• ISSN: 1869-4101; 1869-4101
• DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01246-z

Background Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is an umbrella term referring to painful sensations experienced by patients after spinal surgery, mostly of neuropathic nature. Adequate treatment of FBSS is challenging, as its etiology is believed to be multifactorial and still not fully clarified. Accurate identification of the source of pain is difficult but pivotal to establish the most appropriate treatment strategy. Although the clinical utility of imaging in FBSS patients is still contentious, objective parameters are highly warranted to map different phenotypes of FBSS and tailor each subsequent therapy. Main body Since technological developments have weakened the applicability of prior research, this educational review outlined the recent evidence (i.e., from January 2005 onwards) after a systematic literature search. The state of the art on multiple imaging modalities in FBSS patients was reviewed. Future directions related to functional MRI and the development of imaging biomarkers have also been discussed. Conclusion Besides the fact that more imaging studies correlated with symptomatology in the postoperative setting are warranted, the current educational review outlined that contrast-enhanced MRI and MR neurography have been suggested as valuable imaging protocols to assess alterations in the spine of FBSS patients. The use of imaging biomarkers to study correlations between imaging features and symptomatology might hold future potential; however, more research is required before any promising hypotheses can be drawn.