Cross-reactivity of eight SARS-CoV-2 variants rationally predicts immunogenicity clustering in sarbecoviruses

A steep rise in Omicron reinfection cases suggests that this variant has increased immune evasion ability. To evaluate its antigenicity relationship with other variants, antisera from guinea pigs immunized with spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) and variants of interest (VOIs) we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSignal transduction and targeted therapy Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 256
Main Authors Li, Qianqian, Zhang, Li, Liang, Ziteng, Wang, Nan, Liu, Shuo, Li, Tao, Yu, Yuanling, Cui, Qianqian, Wu, Xi, Nie, Jianhui, Wu, Jiajing, Cui, Zhimin, Lu, Qiong, Wang, Xiangxi, Huang, Weijin, Wang, Youchun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 27.07.2022
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A steep rise in Omicron reinfection cases suggests that this variant has increased immune evasion ability. To evaluate its antigenicity relationship with other variants, antisera from guinea pigs immunized with spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) and variants of interest (VOIs) were cross-tested against pseudotyped variants. The neutralization activity against Omicron was markedly reduced when other VOCs or VOIs were used as immunogens, and Omicron (BA.1)-elicited sera did not efficiently neutralize the other variants. However, a Beta or Omicron booster, when administered as the 4th dose 3-months after the 3rd dose of any of the variants, could elicit broad neutralizing antibodies against all of the current variants including Omicron BA.1. Further analysis with 280 available antigen–antibody structures and quantification of immune escape from 715 reported neutralizing antibodies provide explanations for the observed differential immunogenicity. Three distinct clades predicted using an in silico algorithm for clustering of sarbecoviruses based on immune escape provide key information for rational design of vaccines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2059-3635
2095-9907
2059-3635
DOI:10.1038/s41392-022-01123-7