Developing a risk prediction model for survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients who undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Abstract Background Limited data are available on a risk model for survival to discharge after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model for survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients who undergo ECMO....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of cardiology Vol. 177; no. 3; pp. 1031 - 1035
Main Authors Park, Sung Bum, Yang, Jeong Hoon, Park, Taek Kyu, Cho, Yang Hyun, Sung, Kiick, Chung, Chi Ryang, Park, Chi Min, Jeon, Kyeongman, Song, Young Bin, Hahn, Joo-Yong, Choi, Jin-Ho, Choi, Seung-Hyuk, Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol, Suh, Gee Young
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier B.V 20.12.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Limited data are available on a risk model for survival to discharge after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model for survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients who undergo ECMO. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2012, 505 patients supported by ECMO were enrolled in a retrospective, observational registry. Among those, we studied 152 adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. A new predictive scoring system, named the ECPR score, was developed to monitor survival to discharge using the β coefficients of prognostic factors from the logistic model, which were internally validated. Results In-hospital death occurred in 104 patients (68.4%). In multivariate logistic regression, age ≤ 66, shockable arrest rhythm, CPR to ECMO pump-on time ≤ 38 min, post-ECMO arterial pulse pressure > 24 mm Hg, and post-ECMO Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≤ 14 were independent predictors for survival to discharge. Survival to discharge was predicted by the ECPR score with a c-statistics of 0.8595 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.92; p < 0.001) which was similar to the c-statistics obtained from internal validation (training vs. test set; c-statistics, 0.86 vs. 0.86005; 95% CI, 0.80–0.92 vs. 0.77–0.94). The sensitivity and specificity for prediction of survival to discharge were 89.6% and 75.0%, respectively, when the ECPR score was > 10. Conclusions The new risk prediction model might be helpful for decisions about ECPR management and could provide better information regarding early prognosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.124