Developing a risk prediction model for survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients who undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Abstract Background Limited data are available on a risk model for survival to discharge after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model for survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients who undergo ECMO....
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of cardiology Vol. 177; no. 3; pp. 1031 - 1035 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Shannon
Elsevier B.V
20.12.2014
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Background Limited data are available on a risk model for survival to discharge after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model for survival to discharge in cardiac arrest patients who undergo ECMO. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2012, 505 patients supported by ECMO were enrolled in a retrospective, observational registry. Among those, we studied 152 adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. A new predictive scoring system, named the ECPR score, was developed to monitor survival to discharge using the β coefficients of prognostic factors from the logistic model, which were internally validated. Results In-hospital death occurred in 104 patients (68.4%). In multivariate logistic regression, age ≤ 66, shockable arrest rhythm, CPR to ECMO pump-on time ≤ 38 min, post-ECMO arterial pulse pressure > 24 mm Hg, and post-ECMO Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≤ 14 were independent predictors for survival to discharge. Survival to discharge was predicted by the ECPR score with a c-statistics of 0.8595 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.92; p < 0.001) which was similar to the c-statistics obtained from internal validation (training vs. test set; c-statistics, 0.86 vs. 0.86005; 95% CI, 0.80–0.92 vs. 0.77–0.94). The sensitivity and specificity for prediction of survival to discharge were 89.6% and 75.0%, respectively, when the ECPR score was > 10. Conclusions The new risk prediction model might be helpful for decisions about ECPR management and could provide better information regarding early prognosis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-5273 1874-1754 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.124 |