Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children

•Is Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) needed in scoliosis surgery?•Our experience with INM in 61 surgeries in 56 children shows that it is useful.•Propose alert criteria for Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials in INM.•We recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurophysiology practice Vol. 4; pp. 11 - 17
Main Authors Nagarajan, Lakshmi, Ghosh, Soumya, Dillon, David, Palumbo, Linda, Woodland, Peter, Thalayasingam, Priya, Lethbridge, Martyn
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.01.2019
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Is Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) needed in scoliosis surgery?•Our experience with INM in 61 surgeries in 56 children shows that it is useful.•Propose alert criteria for Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials in INM.•We recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia for INM. Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and concern regarding cost effectiveness. In this paper we present our experience with INM in scoliosis and spine deformation surgery in children, propose alert criteria and preferred anaesthetics in clinical practice. We retrospectively analysed our experience with INM in 56 children who had 61 scoliosis and spine deformity surgeries. INM was successfully undertaken with transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials. There were no injuries due to INM. Four children had 5 alerts during 4 surgeries. A postoperative deficit was seen in one child only. No new postoperative deficits were seen in any child who did not have an alert during INM. Total intravenous anaesthesia was better for INM compared to inhalational anaesthetics. INM is useful in scoliosis surgery; it is likely to mitigate the risk of new deficits following surgery. We recommend alert criteria for TcMEPs that include multiple facets – amplitude, stimulus paradigm, morphology. We recommend propofol and remifentanil, in preference to sevoflurane and remifentanil for anaesthesia during INM. Our study adds to the literature supporting the role of INM in scoliosis surgery in children. We provide guidelines for alarm criteria in clinical practice and recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia as the preferred anaesthetic option.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2467-981X
2467-981X
DOI:10.1016/j.cnp.2018.12.002