Clockwise torque results in higher reoperation rates in left-sided femur fractures

•This study showed a higher risk of reoperation for left-sided compared to right-sided proximal femur fractures after CMN in a large sample size.•The results might substantiate the hypothesis that clockwise rotation during implant insertion and weightbearing lead to higher reoperation rates for left...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInjury Vol. 54; no. 7; p. 110757
Main Authors Oosterhoff, Jacobien H.F., Dijkstra, Hidde, Karhade, Aditya V., Poolman, Rudolf W., Schipper, Inger B., Nelissen, Rob G.H.H., van Embden, Daphne, Jaarsma, Ruurd L., Schwab, Joseph H., Doornberg, Job N., Heng, Marilyn, Jadav, Bhavin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•This study showed a higher risk of reoperation for left-sided compared to right-sided proximal femur fractures after CMN in a large sample size.•The results might substantiate the hypothesis that clockwise rotation during implant insertion and weightbearing lead to higher reoperation rates for left-sided fractures.•Research should focus on planning large size long-term follow-up studies identifying reoperation rates due to implant failure comparing both sides. Effects of clockwise torque rotation onto proximal femoral fracture fixation have been subject of ongoing debate: fixated right-sided trochanteric fractures seem more rotationally stable than left-sided fractures in the biomechanical setting, but this theoretical advantage has not been demonstrated in the clinical setting to date. The purpose of this study was to identify a difference in early reoperation rate between patients undergoing surgery for left- versus right-sided proximal femur fractures using cephalomedullary nailing (CMN). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried from 2016-2019 to identify patients aged 50 years and older undergoing CMN for a proximal femoral fracture. The primary outcome was any unplanned reoperation within 30 days following surgery. The difference was calculated using a Chi-square test, and observed power calculated using post-hoc power analysis. In total, of 20,122 patients undergoing CMN for proximal femoral fracture management, 1.8% (n=371) had to undergo an unplanned reoperation within 30 days after surgery. Overall, 208 (2.0%) were left-sided and 163 (1.7%) right-sided fractures (p=0.052, risk ratio [RR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.50), odds ratio [OR] 1.23 (95%CI 1.00–1.51), power 49.2% (α=0.05). This study shows a higher risk of reoperation for left-sided compared to right-sided proximal femur fractures after CMN in a large sample size. Although results may be underpowered and statistically insignificant, this finding might substantiate the hypothesis that clockwise rotation during implant insertion and (postoperative) weightbearing may lead to higher reoperation rates. Therapeutic level II.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-1383
1879-0267
1879-0267
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.044