Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for older advanced MDS patients: improved survival with young unrelated donor in comparison with HLA-identical siblings
We investigated whether a young human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor (MUD) should be preferred as donor to an HLA-identical sibling (MRD) for older patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (⩾50 years) who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Outcomes of 719 MD...
Saved in:
Published in | Leukemia Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 604 - 609 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.03.2013
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We investigated whether a young human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor (MUD) should be preferred as donor to an HLA-identical sibling (MRD) for older patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (⩾50 years) who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Outcomes of 719 MDS patients with a median age of 58 years (range, 50–73 years) who received AHSCT from related (
n
=555) or unrelated (
n
=164) donors between 1999 and 2008 and reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation were analyzed. The median donor age of the MRD was 56 years (range: 35–78), in contrast to 34 years (range: 19–64) for the MUDs. Influence of donor’s age on survival was not observed for MRD (hazard ratio (HR): 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99–1.02),
P
=0.2), but there was a significant impact of MUD’s age on outcome (HR: 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01–1.06);
P
=0.02). Transplantation from younger MUDs (<30 years) had a significant improved 5-year overall survival in comparison with MRD and older MUDs (>30 years): 40% vs 33% vs 24% (
P
=0.04). In a multivariate analysis, AHSCT from young MUD (<30 years) remained a significant factor for improved survival in comparison with MRD (HR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45–0.95),
P
=0.03), which should be considered in donor selection for older patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0887-6924 1476-5551 |
DOI: | 10.1038/leu.2012.210 |