Operative Safety and Oncologic Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma >7 cm: A Multicenter Study of 222 Patients

Objective To evaluate the safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) >7 cm, addressing the issue of modality and risk factors for complications and open conversion, and to assess the oncologic outcome. Methods The data of 222 patients undergoing LRN for RCC &g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUrology (Ridgewood, N.J.) Vol. 81; no. 6; pp. 1239 - 1245
Main Authors Luciani, Lorenzo G, Porpiglia, Francesco, Cai, Tommaso, D'Elia, Carolina, Vattovani, Valentino, Giusti, Guido, Tiscione, Daniele, Chiodini, Stefano, Peschechera, Roberto, Fiori, Christian, Spina, Rosa, Parma, Paolo, Celia, Antonio, Malossini, Gianni
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.06.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To evaluate the safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) >7 cm, addressing the issue of modality and risk factors for complications and open conversion, and to assess the oncologic outcome. Methods The data of 222 patients undergoing LRN for RCC >7 cm prospectively enrolled from 2002 to 2010 at 5 urologic centers were reviewed. Transperitoneal LRN was performed by 5 experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to assess complications. Multivariable analysis of factors predictive of conversions was performed. Oncologic outcomes for survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Median tumor size was 8.5 cm, operative time was 180 minutes, and blood loss was 280 mL. Forty-two patients (19%) received a blood transfusion. Six (2.7%) patients had grade III-IV complications: 2 with postoperative bleeding requiring abdominal re-exploration and 1 each with adrenal injury, splenic injury, wound diastasis, and respiratory insufficiency. Twelve patients (5.4%) were converted to open surgery. The diameter was 11.9 in converted groups and 8.5 cm in nonconverted groups ( P  = .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that pathologic stage was the only independent predictor of conversion ( P  = .002). The 5-year overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), and progression-free (PFS) survival was 74%, 78%, and 66%, respectively. The 5-year stage-adjusted CSS was 89% in pT2 and 40% in pT3 patients ( P  <.0001). Limitations of this study were its retrospective nature and the relatively short follow-up period for oncologic outcome. Conclusion LRN for large RCC is a safe operation. Stage pT3 is a risk factor for open conversion and is associated to significantly lower cancer-specific survival compared with pT2 stage.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.065