A follow-up study in 28 patients treated with infliximab for severe recalcitrant psoriasis: evidence for efficacy and high incidence of biological autoimmunity

Summary Background  Infliximab, an antitumour necrosis factor‐α chimeric monoclonal antibody, is effective for the treatment of severe psoriasis. While the induction of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antidouble‐stranded‐DNA antibodies (anti‐dsDNA‐ab) is frequently observed in patients with rheumat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 156; no. 2; pp. 329 - 336
Main Authors Poulalhon, N., Begon, E., Lebbé, C., Lioté, F., Lahfa, M., Bengoufa, D., Morel, P., Dubertret, L., Bachelez, H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2007
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background  Infliximab, an antitumour necrosis factor‐α chimeric monoclonal antibody, is effective for the treatment of severe psoriasis. While the induction of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antidouble‐stranded‐DNA antibodies (anti‐dsDNA‐ab) is frequently observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn disease receiving infliximab, the incidence of induced biological and clinical autoimmunity remains unknown in the context of psoriasis. Objectives  To investigate biological and clinical signs of autoimmunity in 28 patients receiving infliximab for severe, recalcitrant forms of psoriasis, and the clinical response to treatment. Methods  Twenty‐eight patients, 15 men and 13 women (median age 39·4 years) with psoriasis refractory to three or more systemic treatments were included. Twenty presented with plaque‐type psoriasis [median Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score 25·9; range 7·2–48], five with psoriatic erythroderma (median PASI score 54; range 48–72) and three with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). Psoriatic arthritis was present in 13 patients (46·4%). Infliximab 5 mg kg−1 was given at week (W) 0, W2, W6 and every 8 weeks thereafter. Clinical data were assessed at baseline and before each infusion. Detection of ANA and of IgM and IgG anti‐dsDNA‐ab were performed at baseline and at W22 by immunofluorescence and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Results  The mean number of infliximab infusions was 5·5 (range 2–15). Among patients with plaque‐type and erythrodermic psoriasis, 17 of 25 (68%) and three of five reached a PASI improvement of 75% or more, respectively, while rapid improvement of clinical and biological signs was observed in all three patients with GPP. The prevalence of positive detection of ANA raised from 12% at baseline to 72% at W22 (P = 0·0001), an increase which was also observed for IgM anti‐dsDNA‐ab (68% vs. 0%, P < 0·0001), while no significant change was observed for the IgG isotype (16% vs. 0%, P = 0·125). Three patients developed nonerosive polyarthritis, without any other criteria for systemic lupus. Conclusions  The incidence of biological autoimmunity is high in patients with refractory psoriasis receiving infliximab. The concomitant onset of polyarthritis in three cases raises the need to investigate the incidence of autoimmune manifestations in psoriatic patients receiving infliximab in further large‐scale studies.
Bibliography:istex:71D55B8F3DAF4796348D3D48034FA99CB289A896
ark:/67375/WNG-4GS6QF99-H
ArticleID:BJD7639
Conflicts of interest M.L. has had paid consulting activities for Serono; L.D. and H.B. have had paid consulting activities for Novartis, Serono and Wyeth.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07639.x