Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation
CRUICKSHANK J. Nursing Inquiry 2012; 19: 71–82 Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation This article starts by considering the differences within the positivist tradition and then it moves on to compare two of the most pr...
Saved in:
Published in | Nursing inquiry Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 71 - 82 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | CRUICKSHANK J. Nursing Inquiry 2012; 19: 71–82
Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation
This article starts by considering the differences within the positivist tradition and then it moves on to compare two of the most prominent schools of postpositivism, namely critical realism and social constructionism. Critical realists hold, with positivism, that knowledge should be positively applied, but reject the positivist method for doing this, arguing that causal explanations have to be based not on empirical regularities but on references to unobservable structures. Social constructionists take a different approach to postpositivism and endorse a relativist rejection of truth and hold that the task of research is to foster a scepticism that undermines any positive truth claim made. It is argued that social constructionism is a contradictory position. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:492B0880B3AB76679EC36EA80816351C11987E08 ArticleID:NIN558 ark:/67375/WNG-V1V2P2BD-F ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1320-7881 1440-1800 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00558.x |