Physiological responses to variable environments: storage and respiration in starving rotifers

• Published in: Freshwater biology Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 637 - 644
• Main Authors: Kirk, Kevin L., Ellis, John, Taylor, Jennifer
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.1999; Blackwell Science; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Asplanchna priodonta; Asplanchna silvestrii; Autoecology; Biological and medical sciences; Brachionus calyciflorus; Freshwater; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Protozoa. Invertebrata; respiration; Rotifera; rotifers; starvation; storage; Synchaeta pectinata; zooplankton; United States; North America; America; Freshwater environment; Fasting; Interspecific comparison; Body weight; Oxygen consumption; Brachionus calyciflorus; Invertebrata; Rotifera; Zooplankton; Adaptation; Metabolic storage
• ISSN: 0046-5070; 1365-2427
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00502.x

1. Zooplankton exist in environments where food availability varies greatly over time, and success depends in part on the ability to store resources when food is abundant and to conserve them when food is scarce. This paper reports on interspecific differences in the size of stored reserves, and in respiration rate during food deprivation, of four species of planktonic rotifers. 2. The size of reserves varied from 42 to 71% of initial (well‐fed) body mass. Interspecific differences in reserve size explained some of the previously observed differences in starvation time. 3. The initial response of respiration rate to food deprivation was quite variable between species. Brachionus calyciflorus was the only species to conserve energy by decreasing respiration rate in response to food deprivation. In contrast, the respiration rate of starved Asplanchna priodonta increased, while that of A. silvestrii and Synchaeta pectinata did not change, during food deprivation. 4. Theory predicts that temporal variation in resource level may facilitate the coexistence of competing species. This theory depends upon trade‐offs between traits that confer competitive success in different environments. Although rotifers show a trade‐off between competitive ability and maximum population growth rate, we found no evidence for trade‐offs between either of those two traits and the size of reserves.