The importance of including imperfect detection models in eDNA experimental design

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is DNA that has been isolated from field samples, and it is increasingly used to infer the presence or absence of particular species in an ecosystem. However, the combination of sampling procedures and subsequent molecular amplification of eDNA can lead to spurious results....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular ecology resources Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 837 - 844
Main Authors Willoughby, Janna R., Wijayawardena, Bhagya K., Sundaram, Mekala, Swihart, Robert K., DeWoody, J. Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Environmental DNA (eDNA) is DNA that has been isolated from field samples, and it is increasingly used to infer the presence or absence of particular species in an ecosystem. However, the combination of sampling procedures and subsequent molecular amplification of eDNA can lead to spurious results. As such, it is imperative that eDNA studies include a statistical framework for interpreting eDNA presence/absence data. We reviewed published literature for studies that utilized eDNA where the species density was known and compared the probability of detecting the focal species to the sampling and analysis protocols. Although biomass of the target species and the volume per sample did not impact detectability, the number of field replicates and number of samples from each replicate were positively related to detection. Additionally, increased number of PCR replicates and increased primer specificity significantly increased detectability. Accordingly, we advocate for increased use of occupancy modelling as a method to incorporate effects of sampling effort and PCR sensitivity in eDNA study design. Based on simulation results and the hierarchical nature of occupancy models, we suggest that field replicates, as opposed to molecular replicates, result in better detection probabilities of target species.
Bibliography:Table S1 Summary of data collected from eDNA studies used in quantitative analysis.Appendix S1 R scripts used to estimate probabilty of detection.
ArticleID:MEN12531
istex:1FF151149B999ECB8A5951A55321E1FCECFE2C0C
ark:/67375/WNG-7DCJ04DJ-G
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant - No. 1407021
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1755-098X
1755-0998
DOI:10.1111/1755-0998.12531