OnabotulinumtoxinA for Lower Limb Spasticity: Guidance From a Delphi Panel Approach

Abstract Background OnabotulinumtoxinA is approved for the treatment of upper and lower limb spasticity in adults. Guidance on common postures and onabotulinumtoxinA injection paradigms for upper limb spasticity has been developed via a Delphi Panel; however, similar guidance for lower limb spastici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPM & R Vol. 9; no. 10; pp. 960 - 968
Main Authors Esquenazi, Alberto, MD, Alfaro, Abraham, PhD, DO, Ayyoub, Ziyad, MD, Charles, David, MD, Dashtipour, Khashayar, MD, PhD, Graham, Glenn D., MD, PhD, McGuire, John R., MD, Odderson, Ib R., MD, PhD, Patel, Atul T., MD, MHSA, Simpson, David M., MD, FAAN
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.10.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background OnabotulinumtoxinA is approved for the treatment of upper and lower limb spasticity in adults. Guidance on common postures and onabotulinumtoxinA injection paradigms for upper limb spasticity has been developed via a Delphi Panel; however, similar guidance for lower limb spasticity has not been established. Objective To define a clinically recommended treatment paradigm for the use of onabotulinumtoxinA for each common posture among patients with poststroke lower limb spasticity (PSLLS) and to identify the most common PSLLS aggregate postures. Design Clinical experts provided insight regarding onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for PSLLS using an adaptation of the Delphi consensus process. Setting Delphi panel. Participants Ten expert clinicians in neurology and physical medicine and rehabilitation who treat PSLLS. Methods A minimum of 2 rounds of anonymous voting occurred for each recommendation until consensus was reached (≥66% agreement). The first round was conducted via a survey; the second round was an in-person meeting. Main Outcome Measurements Reached consensus on muscle selection for injection, overall and per-muscle dose of onabotulinumtoxinA, number of injection sites/muscle, onabotulinumtoxinA dilution, and use of localization techniques. The most common PSLLS postures were reviewed. Recommendations were tailored toward injectors with less experience. Results Consensus was reached on targeted subsets of muscles for each posture. Doses ranged from 20 to 150 U for individual muscles and 50 to 300 U for limb postures. OnabotulinumtoxinA dilution 50 U/mL (2:1 ratio) was considered most appropriate but varied based on muscles selected (range, 2:1-4:1). Experts agreed that localization techniques for muscle identification during injection for all postures would be useful. For suboptimal response to injection, all panel members would increase the dose, and the majority (89%) would increase the number of treated muscles. The panel identified 3 common aggregating lower limb postures: (1) equinovarus foot and flexed toes; (2) extended knee and plantar flexed foot/ankle; and (3) plantar flexed foot/ankle and flexed toes. The recommended starting doses for each aggregate posture were 400 U, 400 U, and 300 U, respectively. Conclusion The modified Delphi panel process provided consensus on common muscles and corresponding onabotulinumtoxinA treatment paradigms for postures associated with PSLLS that can be used for guidance in optimizing care delivery. Level of Evidence To be determined.
Bibliography:Disclosures outside this publication: grant and personal fees, Merz (speaking honoraria); grant, Ispen
Disclosure outside this publication: grant, Ipsen
Disclosures related to this publication: grant and personal fees, Allergan plc (speaking honoraria)
Disclosures outside this publication: personal fees, Abbvie, Cynapsus, Teva, Impax, UCB, Ipsen, Lundbeck, Merz, US WorldMeds (honoraria for consulting, advisory services or speaking services)
Disclosures related to this publication: personal fees, Allergan plc (honoraria for consulting, advisory services or speaking services)
Disclosures outside this publication: other, Alliance (for patient access); personal fees, Ispen (consulting services), Medtronic (consulting services), USWorldMeds (consulting services)
Disclosures outside this publication: grant and personal fees, Merz (speaking honoraria), Ispen (speaking honoraria)
Disclosures related to this publication: grant and personal fees, Allergan plc (consultant and advisory board member)
Disclosures outside this publication: grant and personal fees, Merz (consultant and advisory board member), Ispen (consultant and advisory board member)
Disclosures related to this publication: personal fees, Allergan plc (advisory board member)
Disclosures outside this publication: personal fees, Ispen (advisory board member)
Disclosures related to this publication: research support, Allergan and Ipsen
Disclosures outside this publication: grant and personal fees, Merz (speaking honoraria)
Disclosures related to this publication: honoraria as a consultant and speaker, Allergan
Disclosures related to this publication: grant and personal fees, Allergan plc (money to institution)
Disclosures outside this publication: consultancy, Janssen
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1934-1482
1934-1563
DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.014