Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling

The psychometric properties of a clinician-administered, DSM-IV-based, structured clinical interview for pathological gambling (SCI-PG) were examined. Seventy-two consecutive subjects requesting treatment for gambling problems were administered the SCI-PG. Reliability and validity were determined. C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychiatry research Vol. 128; no. 1; pp. 79 - 88
Main Authors Grant, Jon E., Steinberg, Marvin A., Kim, Suck Won, Rounsaville, Bruce J., Potenza, Marc N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 30.08.2004
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The psychometric properties of a clinician-administered, DSM-IV-based, structured clinical interview for pathological gambling (SCI-PG) were examined. Seventy-two consecutive subjects requesting treatment for gambling problems were administered the SCI-PG. Reliability and validity were determined. Classification accuracy was examined using longitudinal course of illness. The SCI-PG demonstrated excellent inter-rater and test–retest reliability. Concurrent validity was observed with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Discriminant validity was observed with measures of anxiety and depression. The SCI-PG demonstrated both high sensitivity and specificity based on longitudinal assessment. The SCI-PG demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in diagnosing PG in subjects presenting with gambling problems. These findings require replication in other groups to examine their generalizability.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0165-1781
1872-7123
DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2004.05.006