Factors affecting satisfaction in patients with a rotator cuff retear: CT arthrography-based study

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 486
• Main Authors: Lee, Bong Gun, Kim, Joo-Hak, Lee, Chang-Hun, Eim, Seong Hyuk, Han, Kyeong-Jin, Choi, Wan-Sun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 13.06.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Arthrography; Care and treatment; Clinical outcomes; Computed tomography; Computed tomography arthrography; CT imaging; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Elbow; Evaluation; Humans; Magnetic resonance imaging; Musculoskeletal diseases; Pain; Pain, Postoperative; Patient outcomes; Patient Satisfaction; Personal Satisfaction; Retear; Risk factors; Rotator cuff; Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging; Rotator Cuff - surgery; Rotator cuff repair; Shoulder; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Trauma; Ultrasonic imaging; South Korea; Computed tomography arthrography; Patient satisfaction; Retear; Rotator cuff repair
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06617-1

The relationship between retear that may occur after rotator cuff repair and patient satisfaction is not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the types and size of the retear evaluated by computed tomography arthrography (CTA) influenced patient satisfaction. We also analyzed the patient factors that could affect patient satisfaction. A total of 50 patients who were diagnosed with rotator cuff retear after undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included in this study. All the patients were dichotomously classified into the satisfactory or dissatisfactory groups according to the patients' self-classifications. CTA was used to assess the attachment status of the footprint, detect retear on the medial side of the footprint of the repaired cuff, and determine the retear size. Demographic factors, including sex, age, occupation, dominant upper extremity, duration of pain, presence of diabetes mellitus, trauma history, history of ipsilateral shoulder surgery, repair technique, worker's compensation status, and functional shoulder score, were investigated. Thirty-nine patients were classified into the satisfactory group and 11 patients were classified into the dissatisfactory group. There were no differences in age, sex, occupation, dominant hand, duration of pain, presence of diabetes mellitus, trauma history, history of ipsilateral shoulder surgery, repair technique, worker's compensation, and duration of follow-up between the two groups. However, the postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score (P < 0.01), visual analog scale (VAS) pain level (P < 0.01), anteroposterior (AP) length (P < 0.01), and area of the retear site (P < 0.01) were significantly different. The AP length and area of the retear site estimated using CTA were confirmed as the significant risk factors for dissatisfaction. However, the type of repaired rotator cuff judged by the attachment status of the footprint did not correlate with patient satisfaction. In addition, the postoperative VAS pain scale and ASES score was correlated with patient satisfaction.