The influence of electrodes on the performance of light-emitting electrochemical cells

• Published in: Electrochimica acta Vol. 52; no. 23; pp. 6456 - 6462
• Main Authors: Shin, Joon Ho, Matyba, Piotr, Robinson, Nathaniel D., Edman, Ludvig
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 10.07.2007; Elsevier
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Conjugated polymer; Cyclic voltammetry; Doping progression; Electrochemical stability; Electronics; Exact sciences and technology; LEC; Light-emitting electrochemical cell; Optoelectronic devices; Organic Electronics; polymer; Polymer electronics; Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices; TECHNOLOGY; TEKNIKVETENSKAP; Cyclic voltammetry; Conjugated polymer; Light-emitting electrochemical cell; Doping progression; Electrochemical stability; Gold; Polymer blends; Stability; Doping; Transition metal; Aluminium; Phenylenevinylene derivative polymer; Metal; Electrode material; Ethylene oxide polymer; Conducting polymers; Electroluminescent device; Performance
• ISSN: 0013-4686; 1873-3859; 1873-3859
• DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.068

We demonstrate that the electrochemical properties of the electrode material can have a dramatic impact on the performance of light-emitting electrochemical cells (LECs). Specifically, we report results from planar wide-gap LECs containing a blend of poly(2-methoxy,5-(2′-ethylhexyloxy)- p-phenylene vinylene) (MEH-PPV), poly(ethylene oxide) and LiCF 3SO 3 as the active material. We find that Au electrodes are preferable over Al electrodes, since Au-electrode devices exhibit fast turn-on (i.e., p–n junction formation time) and clearly visible light emission during operation at 5 V and 360 K, while Al-electrode devices exhibit slow turn-on (due to a delayed onset of p-doping progression) and no visible light emission. These results are rationalized with a cyclic voltammetry study, which demonstrates that Al is oxidized at a lower potential than the p-doping (oxidation) potential of MEH-PPV, while Au is electrochemically inert over the entire voltage range spanned by the p- and n-doping potentials of MEH-PPV. Consequently, the oxidation charge injected into Al-electrode devices results in a combination of p-doping of MEH-PPV and formation of Al ions. The latter process is undesired since it results in a slow turn-on time and quenched light emission. Finally, we find that planar LECs in a bottom-electrode configuration exhibit a faster turn-on time than identical devices with the electrodes on top of the active material.