Clinical impact of the use of the revised International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer staging system to operable non-small-cell lung cancers

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the impact of the use of the present classification IASLC staging system (TNM7) on the categorization of patients and survival after resection. Methods Between August 1985 and January 2007, 414 consecutive patients underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Vol. 74; no. 2; pp. 244 - 247
Main Authors Lyons, Gustavo, Quadrelli, Silvia, Jordan, Pablo, Colt, Henri, Chimondeguy, Domingo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.11.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the impact of the use of the present classification IASLC staging system (TNM7) on the categorization of patients and survival after resection. Methods Between August 1985 and January 2007, 414 consecutive patients underwent pulmonary resection with a curative intention for NSCLC at the British Hospital in Buenos Aires were included in this study only if they were pathologically staged as N0-M0. Preoperative staging was performed according to the TNM classification system of the International Union Against Cancer (173 men, 58 women). Results 231 tumours were identified as pathological N0. Mean age was 61.4 years. 173 patients (74.9%) were men. When the TNM7 was applied, 28 patients (12.1%) changed their T factor staging (14 were moved towards a higher T and 14 were moved to a lower T) and 41 patients (17.7%) changed their pathological staging by applying the TNM7: 14 patients were downstaged (6.1%) and 27 (11.7%) were upstaged. With the present T definition among 103 patients in stage IB 27 were upstaged (18 to IIA and 9 to IIB) and in the group of stage IIIB ( n = 14) all of them were downstaged (5 to IIB and 9 to IIA). The current T definition showed a statistically significant difference between the two T1 subgroups (93% versus 70% 5 year survival between T1a and T1b, p = 0.027). Conclusion This study shows that the clinical impact of the using the IASLC proposed staging system would be modest but relevant, identifying a subgroup with a better prognosis (T1a).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.02.010