A fresh approach to evidence synthesis

Systematic reviews have transformed medicine, but a more cost-effective means of appraisal is needed for fields in which data are sparse and patchy, argue William J. Sutherland and Claire F. R. Wordley. Systematic reviews have transformed medicine, but a more cost-effective means of appraisal is nee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature (London) Vol. 558; no. 7710; pp. 364 - 366
Main Authors Sutherland, William J., Wordley, Claire F. R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.06.2018
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
631/158/672
692/308
706/648/453
Animals
Aquatic birds
Arthritis
Birds
Clinical trials
comment
Conservation of Natural Resources - economics
Corticosteroid drugs
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Evidence-Based Practice - economics
Evidence-Based Practice - trends
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Infants
Intervention
Medium term notes
Methods
multidisciplinary
Policy Making
Researchers
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Scientific communication
Steroids (Organic compounds)
Studies
Systematic review
Time Factors
United Kingdom > UK
Policy
Conservation biology
Medical research
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Systematic reviews have transformed medicine, but a more cost-effective means of appraisal is needed for fields in which data are sparse and patchy, argue William J. Sutherland and Claire F. R. Wordley. Systematic reviews have transformed medicine, but a more cost-effective means of appraisal is needed for fields in which data are sparse and patchy.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Commentary-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/d41586-018-05472-8