Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy plans: Achieving dose coverage, conformity, and dose falloff

• Published in: Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists Vol. 40; no. 3; p. 181
• Main Authors: Hong, Linda X, Shankar, Viswanathan, Shen, Jin, Kuo, Hsiang-Chi, Mynampati, Dinesh, Yaparpalvi, Ravindra, Goddard, Lee, Basavatia, Amar, Fox, Jana, Garg, Madhur, Kalnicki, Shalom, Tomé, Wolfgang A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 2015
• Subjects: Humans; Organ Sparing Treatments - methods; Radiation Protection - methods; Radiometry - methods; Radiosurgery - methods; Radiotherapy Dosage; Reproducibility of Results; Scattering, Radiation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spinal Cord - surgery; Spinal Neoplasms - surgery; Treatment Outcome; Spine SBRT plans
• ISSN: 1873-4022
• DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.11.002

We report our experience of establishing planning objectives to achieve dose coverage, conformity, and dose falloff for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans. Patients with spine lesions were treated using SBRT in our institution since September 2009. Since September 2011, we established the following planning objectives for our SBRT spine plans in addition to the cord dose constraints: (1) dose coverage—prescription dose (PD) to cover at least 95% planning target volume (PTV) and 90% PD to cover at least 99% PTV; (2) conformity index (CI)—ratio of prescription isodose volume (PIV) to the PTV < 1.2; (3) dose falloff—ratio of 50% PIV to the PTV (R(50%)); (4) and maximum dose in percentage of PD at 2 cm from PTV in any direction (D(2cm)) to follow Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0915. We have retrospectively reviewed 66 separate spine lesions treated between September 2009 and December 2012 (31 treated before September 2011 [group 1] and 35 treated after [group 2]). The χ(2) test was used to examine the difference in parameters between groups. The PTV V(100% PD) ≥ 95% objective was met in 29.0% of group 1 vs 91.4% of group 2 (p < 0.01) plans. The PTV V(90% PD) ≥ 99% objective was met in 38.7% of group 1 vs 88.6% of group 2 (p < 0.01) plans. Overall, 4 plans in group 1 had CI > 1.2 vs none in group 2 (p = 0.04). For D(2cm), 48.3% plans yielded a minor violation of the objectives and 16.1% a major violation for group 1, whereas 17.1% exhibited a minor violation and 2.9% a major violation for group 2 (p < 0.01). Spine SBRT plans can be improved on dose coverage, conformity, and dose falloff employing a combination of RTOG spine and lung SBRT protocol planning objectives.