Food diversity: its relation to children's health and consequent economic burden

This study investigates the impact of low food diversity on the health status of children using the Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) and Dietary Serving Score (DSS) in a sub-district with the highest percentage of poor households. The economic burden of low food diversity was observed by analysing the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC public health Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 1155
Main Authors Hasanah, Alfiah, Kharisma, Bayu, Remi, Sutyastie S, Adam, Asep Muhammad, Siregar, Adiatma Y M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 24.04.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigates the impact of low food diversity on the health status of children using the Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) and Dietary Serving Score (DSS) in a sub-district with the highest percentage of poor households. The economic burden of low food diversity was observed by analysing the cost of illness in the children with low food diversity. Data from 329 children were collected. We determined the impact of DDS and DSS and other factors on the health status of children aged 2-14 years, using a probit model. The cost of illness (e.g., typhus, stomach ulcers, coughs, flu, and fever) due to low food diversity was calculated from medical registration fees, medical action costs, transportation costs, and other costs. The results shows that a 1% point increase in DDS or DSS potentially decreases children's health complaints by 10% and 8%, respectively. Given the current 26% prevalence of health complaints among children with low DDS, the annual economic burden reaches US$75.72 per child per household. In addition, the current 41% prevalence of children with low DDS resulted in an annual cost to the government of US$153.45 per child. The effect of inadequate dietary diversity on children's health is potentially high and contributes to the economic burden on households and the government.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2458
1471-2458
DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-18530-w