"It's Like Tuskegee in Reverse": A Case Study of Ethical Tensions in Institutional Review Board Review of Community-Based Participatory Research

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) addresses the social justice dimensions of health disparities by engaging marginalized communities, building capacity for action, and encouraging more egalitarian relationships between researchers and communities. CBPR may challenge institutionalized aca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of public health (1971) Vol. 96; no. 11; pp. 1914 - 1919
Main Authors Malone, Ruth E, Yerger, Valerie B, McGruder, Carol, Froelicher, Erika
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Am Public Health Assoc 01.11.2006
American Public Health Association
American Journal of Public Health 2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Community-based participatory research (CBPR) addresses the social justice dimensions of health disparities by engaging marginalized communities, building capacity for action, and encouraging more egalitarian relationships between researchers and communities. CBPR may challenge institutionalized academic practices and the understandings that inform institutional review board deliberations and, indirectly, prioritize particular kinds of research. We present our attempt to study, as part of a CBPR partnership, cigarette sales practices in an inner-city community. We use critical and communitarian perspectives to examine the implications of the refusal of the university institutional review board (in this case, the University of California, San Francisco) to approve the study. CBPR requires expanding ethical discourse beyond the procedural, principle-based approaches common in biomedical research settings. The current ethics culture of academia may sometimes serve to protect institutional power at the expense of community empowerment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Peer Reviewed
Contributors…All authors originated ideas, developed the case study, interpreted findings, and reviewed drafts of the article. R.E. Malone completed the critical analyses and wrote the article.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Ruth Malone, RN, PhD, FAAN, UCSF, Box 0612, San Francisco, CA 94143–0612 (e-mail: ruth.malone@ucsf.edu).
ISSN:0090-0036
1541-0048
1541-0048
DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2005.082172