Exposure and effects assessment of resident mink (Mustela vison) exposed to polychlorinated dibenzofurans and other dioxin-like compounds in the Tittabawassee River basin, Midland, Michigan, USA

Historically, sediments and floodplain soils of the Tittabawassee River (TR; MI, USA) have been contaminated with polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins (PCDDs), and polychlorinatedbiphenyls (PCBs). Median concentrations of 2,3,7,8‐tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin equiva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry Vol. 27; no. 10; pp. 2076 - 2087
Main Authors Zwiernik, Matthew J., Kay, Denise P., Moore, Jeremy, Beckett, Kerrie J., Khim, Jong Seong, Newsted, John L., Roark, Shaun A., Giesy, John P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.10.2008
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Historically, sediments and floodplain soils of the Tittabawassee River (TR; MI, USA) have been contaminated with polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins (PCDDs), and polychlorinatedbiphenyls (PCBs). Median concentrations of 2,3,7,8‐tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin equivalents (TEQs) based on 2006 World Health Organization tetrachloro‐dibenzo‐p‐dioxin toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) in the diet of mink (Mustela vison) ranged from 6.8 × 10−1 ng TEQ/kg wet weight upstream of the primary source of PCDF to 3.1 × 101 ng TEQ/kg wet weight downstream. Estimates of toxicity reference values (TRVs) derived from laboratory studies with individual PCDDs/PCDFs and PCB congeners or mixtures of those congeners, as well as application of TEFs, were compared to site‐specific measures of mink exposure. Hazard quotients based on exposures expressed as concentrations of TEQs in the 95th percentile of the mink diet or liver and the no‐observable‐adverse‐effect TRVs were determined to be 1.7 and 8.6, respectively. The resident mink survey, however, including number of mink present, morphological measures, sex ratios, population age structure, and gross and histological tissue examination, indicated no observable adverse effects. This resulted for multiple reasons: First, the exposure estimate was conservative, and second, the predominantly PCDF congener mixture present in the TR appeared to be less potent than predicted from TEQs based on dose–response comparisons. Given this, there appears to be great uncertainty in comparing the measured concentrations of TEQs at this site to TRVs derived from different congeners or congener mixtures. Based on the lack of negative outcomes for any measurement endpoints examined, including jaw lesions, a sentinel indicator of possible adverse effects, and direct measures of effects on individual mink and their population, it was concluded that current concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs were not causing adverse effects on resident mink of the TR.
Bibliography:istex:03C3708D89FA51AE56A7E8C362EE16EBF8987DFB
ArticleID:ETC5620271012
Published on the Web 4/24/2008.
ark:/67375/WNG-S3DP57XD-C
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0730-7268
1552-8618
DOI:10.1897/07-489.1