Comparison of Smoothness, Movement Speed and Trajectory during Reaching Movements in Real and Virtual Spaces Using a Head-Mounted Display

• Published in: Life (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 13; no. 8; p. 1618
• Main Authors: Kato, Norio, Iuchi, Tomoya, Murabayashi, Katsunobu, Tanaka, Toshiaki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.07.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Aerospace environments; Analysis; body coordinate system; Computer applications; Computer graphics; Computer peripherals; Computer software industry; Cost analysis; Flight simulators; Helmet mounted displays; Human mechanics; movement smoothness; Orthopedics; Parallax; Rehabilitation; Simulation; Smoothness; Software; Speed; Therapeutics, Experimental; Training; Training simulators; Trajectory analysis; Velocity; Virtual reality; United States; Japan; Taiwan
• ISSN: 2075-1729; 2075-1729
• DOI: 10.3390/life13081618

Virtual reality is used in rehabilitation and training simulators. However, whether movements in real and virtual spaces are similar is yet to be elucidated. The study aimed to examine the smoothness, trajectory, and velocity of participants’ movements during task performance in real and virtual space. Ten participants performed the same motor task in these two spaces, reaching for targets placed at six distinct positions. A head-mounted display (HMD) presented the virtual space, which simulated the real space environment. The smoothness of movements during the task was quantified and analysed using normalised jerk cost. Trajectories were analysed using the actual trajectory length normalised by the shortest distance to the target, and velocity was analysed using the time of peak velocity. The analysis results showed no significant differences in smoothness and peak velocity time between the two spaces. No significant differences were found in the placement of the six targets between the two spaces. Conversely, significant differences were observed in trajectory length ratio and peak velocity time, albeit with small effect sizes. This outcome can potentially be attributed to the fact that the virtual space was presented from a first-person perspective using an HMD capable of presenting stereoscopic images through binocular parallax. Participants were able to obtain physiological depth information and directly perceive the distance between the target and the effector, such as a hand or a controller, in virtual space, similar to real space. The results suggest that training in virtual space using HMDs with binocular disparity may be a useful tool, as it allows the simulation of a variety of different environments.