How to publish a lot—The sequel to writing

Eschew vague statements about data collection or analysis techniques. Contrast this with a more detailed account: “This study, approved by the University's IRB (#IRB number), was a retrospective chart review of tracheostomy patients ages 18–99 years old. [...]if you are utilizing survival analy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology Vol. 8; no. 5; pp. 1257 - 1258
Main Author Johnson, Romaine F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.10.2023
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Eschew vague statements about data collection or analysis techniques. Contrast this with a more detailed account: “This study, approved by the University's IRB (#IRB number), was a retrospective chart review of tracheostomy patients ages 18–99 years old. [...]if you are utilizing survival analysis, the book's recommendations can make your narrative clear and concise.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
This essay, the first of four parts, delves into the world of academic publishing of original research. It offers tips for the next step after writing, getting published.
ISSN:2378-8038
2378-8038
DOI:10.1002/lio2.1142