How to publish a lot—The sequel to writing
Eschew vague statements about data collection or analysis techniques. Contrast this with a more detailed account: “This study, approved by the University's IRB (#IRB number), was a retrospective chart review of tracheostomy patients ages 18–99 years old. [...]if you are utilizing survival analy...
Saved in:
Published in | Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology Vol. 8; no. 5; pp. 1257 - 1258 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.10.2023
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Eschew vague statements about data collection or analysis techniques. Contrast this with a more detailed account: “This study, approved by the University's IRB (#IRB number), was a retrospective chart review of tracheostomy patients ages 18–99 years old. [...]if you are utilizing survival analysis, the book's recommendations can make your narrative clear and concise. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Editorial-2 ObjectType-Commentary-1 This essay, the first of four parts, delves into the world of academic publishing of original research. It offers tips for the next step after writing, getting published. |
ISSN: | 2378-8038 2378-8038 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lio2.1142 |