Impacts of national vs European carbon pricing on agriculture

The agricultural sector has the potential to contribute to reaching both global and national climate targets. Lately, frequent discussions emerge among academics as well as policymakers regarding whether the agricultural sector should be subject to carbon pricing under different emission trading sys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental research letters Vol. 18; no. 7; pp. 74016 - 74030
Main Authors Stepanyan, Davit, Heidecke, Claudia, Osterburg, Bernhard, Gocht, Alexander
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bristol IOP Publishing 01.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The agricultural sector has the potential to contribute to reaching both global and national climate targets. Lately, frequent discussions emerge among academics as well as policymakers regarding whether the agricultural sector should be subject to carbon pricing under different emission trading systems. Germany has set ambitious climate targets envisaging to reach carbon neutrality by 2045, and the EU plans reaching carbon neutrality by 2050. However, the current GHG emission mitigation trends are not in line with this goal. In this study, we quantitatively analyze the environmental and economic effects of the possible inclusion of the agricultural sector into a carbon pricing scheme, once for Germany only, and second for the EU. Moreover, we evaluate the role of already existing and novel technological mitigation options in the GHG emissions mitigation quest. Our findings demonstrate that even the unilateral action by Germany leads to net agricultural emissions reduction, although, the effect obtained by the EU-wide implementation of carbon pricing in agriculture is fivefold larger. The results also highlight the importance of stimulating the use and transferability of the technological options not only in mitigating GHG emissions but also in alleviating the emission leakage to third countries and easing the economic consequences of such a policy.
Bibliography:ERL-115419.R3
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1748-9326
1748-9326
DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/acdcac