Changing HCW attitudes: a case study of normalizing HIV service delivery in emergency departments

• Published in: BMC health services research Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 629
• Main Authors: Rao, Aditi, Chen, Victoria H, Hill, Sarah, Reynolds, Steven J, Redd, Andrew D, Stead, David, Hoffmann, Christopher, Quinn, Thomas C, Hansoti, Bhakti
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 11.05.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Attitudes; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Care and treatment; Clinical medicine; Counseling; Emergency Department; Emergency medical care; Emergency service; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Health care; Health facilities; Health services; HIV; HIV (Viruses); HIV care cascade; HIV Infections - therapy; HIV Testing; Hospitals; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Intervention; Male; Medical personnel; Medical tests; Men; Mens health; Participation; Patients; Services; Social aspects; South Africa; Young Adult; South Africa; Eastern Cape South Africa; HIV care cascade; Normalization process theory; HIV; Emergency Department; Implementation science; Men; HIV testing; South Africa
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07942-2

Delays in the implementation of evidence-based practices are significant and ubiquitous, compromising health outcomes. Resistance to change is a key factor in hindering adoption and integration of new evidence-based interventions. This study seeks to understand the impact of exposure to HIV testing within a research context on provider attitudes towards HIV counselling and testing (HCT) in emergency departments (ED). This is a pre-and-post study design measuring the effect of a new ED-based HCT intervention, conducted by lay counsellors, on provider attitudes in Eastern Cape, South Africa. A validated, anonymized, 7-item survey was self-completed by routine care providers (physicians, nurses, and case managers). Questions were scored on a 5-point Likert scale with 5 consistently reflecting a positive attitude. Mean scores were calculated for each question and compared using a two-sample t-test to assess change in sample means for attitudes among providers surveyed before and after the intervention. A total of 132 surveys were completed across three EDs. Majority of respondents were female (70.5%), 20-29 years old (37.9%), of African race (81.1%), nurses (39.4%), and practicing medicine for 0-4 years (37.9%). Pre-intervention, providers displayed a positive attitude towards 'the benefit of offering ED-based HCT to patients' (4.33), 'the ED offering HCT' (3.53), 'all ED patients receiving HCT' (3.42), 'concern about patient reaction to HCT' (3.26), and 'comfort with disclosing HCT results' (3.21); and a mildly negative attitude towards 'only high-risk ED patients receiving HCT' (2.68), and 'the burden of offering HCT in a clinical environment' (2.80). Post-intervention, provider attitudes improved significantly towards 'all ED patients receiving HCT' (3.86, p < 0.05), 'only high-risk ED patients receiving HCT' (2.30, p < 0.05), 'the burden of offering HCT in a clinical environment' (3.21, p < 0.05), and 'comfort with disclosing HCT results' (3.81, p < 0.05). Controlled exposure to new practices with a structured implementation period can shift attitudes beginning a process of practice normalization. In our study, we observed improvements in provider attitudes regarding the benefits of HCT and the burden of offering HCT to all patients in the ED. Research activities may have a role in mitigating resistance to change and supporting intervention adoption.