English compound and non-compound processing in bilingual and multilingual speakers Effects of dominance and sequential multilingualism

This article reports on a study investigating the relative influence of the first language and dominant language (L1) on second language (L2) and third language (L3) morpho-lexical processing. A lexical decision task compared the responses to English NV-er compounds (e.g. taxi driver) and non-compou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSecond Language Research Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 503 - 535
Main Authors Alonso, Jorge González, Villegas, Julián, del Pilar García Mayo, María
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE 01.10.2016
SAGE Publications
Sage Publications Ltd
Sage Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article reports on a study investigating the relative influence of the first language and dominant language (L1) on second language (L2) and third language (L3) morpho-lexical processing. A lexical decision task compared the responses to English NV-er compounds (e.g. taxi driver) and non-compounds provided by a group of native speakers and three groups of learners at various levels of English proficiency: L1 Spanish – L2 English sequential bilinguals and two groups of early Spanish–Basque bilinguals with English as their L3. Crucially, the two trilingual groups differed in their first and dominant language (i.e. L1 Spanish – L2 Basque vs. L1 Basque – L2 Spanish). Our materials exploit an (a)symmetry between these languages: while Basque and English pattern together in the basic structure of (productive) NV-er compounds, Spanish presents a construction that differs in directionality as well as inflection of the verbal element (V[3SG] + N). Results show between and within group differences in accuracy and response times that may be ascribable to two factors besides proficiency: the number of languages spoken by a given participant and their dominant language. An examination of response bias reveals an influence of the participants’ first and dominant language on the processing of NV-er compounds. Our data suggest that morphological information in the non-native lexicon may extend beyond morphemic structure and that, similarly to bilingualism, there are costs to sequential multilingualism in lexical retrieval.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
Second language research
ISSN:0267-6583
1477-0326
1477-0326
DOI:10.1177/0267658316642819