Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes

Older adults ( n = 113) participated in focus groups discussing their use of and attitudes about technology in the context of their home, work, and healthcare. Participants reported using a wide variety of technology items, particularly in their homes. Positive attitudes (i.e., likes) outnumbered ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputers in human behavior Vol. 26; no. 6; pp. 1710 - 1721
Main Authors Mitzner, Tracy L., Boron, Julie B., Fausset, Cara Bailey, Adams, Anne E., Charness, Neil, Czaja, Sara J., Dijkstra, Katinka, Fisk, Arthur D., Rogers, Wendy A., Sharit, Joseph
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Older adults ( n = 113) participated in focus groups discussing their use of and attitudes about technology in the context of their home, work, and healthcare. Participants reported using a wide variety of technology items, particularly in their homes. Positive attitudes (i.e., likes) outnumbered negative attitudes (i.e., dislikes), suggesting that older adults perceive the benefits of technology use to outweigh the costs of such use. Positive attitudes were most frequently related to how the technology supported activities, enhanced convenience, and contained useful features. Negative attitudes were most frequently associated with technology creating inconveniences, unhelpful features, as well as security and reliability concerns. Given that older adults reported more positive than negative attitudes about the technologies they use, these results contradict stereotypes that older adults are afraid or unwilling to use technology. These findings also highlight the importance of perceived benefits of use and ease of use for models of technology acceptance. Emphasizing the benefits of technology in education and training programs may increase future technology adoption.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0747-5632
1873-7692
DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020