Low‐field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges

Modern MRI scanners have trended toward higher field strengths to maximize signal and resolution while minimizing scan time. However, high‐field devices remain expensive to install and operate, making them scarce outside of high‐income countries and major population centers. Low‐field strength scann...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 57; no. 1; pp. 25 - 44
Main Authors Arnold, Thomas Campbell, Freeman, Colbey W., Litt, Brian, Stein, Joel M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2023
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Modern MRI scanners have trended toward higher field strengths to maximize signal and resolution while minimizing scan time. However, high‐field devices remain expensive to install and operate, making them scarce outside of high‐income countries and major population centers. Low‐field strength scanners have drawn renewed academic, industry, and philanthropic interest due to advantages that could dramatically increase imaging access, including lower cost and portability. Nevertheless, low‐field MRI still faces inherent limitations in image quality that come with decreased signal. In this article, we review advantages and disadvantages of low‐field MRI scanners, describe hardware and software innovations that accentuate advantages and mitigate disadvantages, and consider clinical applications for a new generation of low‐field devices. In our review, we explore how these devices are being or could be used for high acuity brain imaging, outpatient neuroimaging, MRI‐guided procedures, pediatric imaging, and musculoskeletal imaging. Challenges for their successful clinical translation include selecting and validating appropriate use cases, integrating with standards of care in high resource settings, expanding options with actionable information in low resource settings, and facilitating health care providers and clinical practice in new ways. By embracing both the promise and challenges of low‐field MRI, clinicians and researchers have an opportunity to transform medical care for patients around the world. Level of Evidence 5 Technical Efficacy Stage 6
Bibliography:Contract grant sponsor: Thomas Campbell Arnold was funded in part by the HHMI‐NIBIB Interfaces Initiative (5T32EB009384). Joel M. Stein receives support from a research services agreement between Hyperfine, Inc. and the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.28408