Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: Recommendations from the Patient‐Centered CDS Learning Network

• Published in: Learning health systems Vol. 4; no. 2; pp. e10208 - n/a
• Main Authors: Richardson, Joshua E., Middleton, Blackford, Platt, Jodyn E., Blumenfeld, Barry H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2020; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Brief; Clinical medicine; decision support systems, clinical; Ecosystems; Electronic health records; Engineers; Health care policy; health policy; Knowledge management; learning health system; Patients; Professionals; Quality; Researchers; Trust; trust; learning health system; health policy; decision support systems, clinical
• ISSN: 2379-6146; 2379-6146
• DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10208

Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. We discuss our investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient‐Centered CDS Learning Network's Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG). The TFWG identified 12 actors (eg, vendors, clinicians, and policy makers) within a CDS ecosystem who each may play a meaningful role in prioritizing, authoring, implementing, or evaluating CDS and developed 33 recommendations distributed across nine “trust attributes.” The trust attributes and recommendations represent a range of considerations such as the “Competency” of knowledge artifact engineers and the “Organizational Capacity” of institutions that develop and implement CDS. The TFWG findings highlight an initial effort to make trust explicit and embedded within CDS knowledge artifacts and repositories and thus more broadly accepted and used.