Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in treating immune‐related hepatitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor use: A retrospective study

Background and Aim To investigate the outcomes in eight Japanese patients with cancer treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment‐induced severe immune‐related hepatitis (ir‐hepatitis) and the efficacy and safety of MMF. Methods We retrospec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJGH open Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 87 - 97
Main Authors Kadokawa, Yukio, Inoue, Satoko, Tatsumi, Akitoshi, Uchida, Mayako, Fujita, Keiko, Takagi, Mari, Inoue, Takako, Ohe, Shuichi, Nakai, Yasutomo, Otsuka, Tomoyuki, Abe, Yutaro, Nakabori, Tasuku, Isei, Taiki, Kumagai, Toru, Nishimura, Kazuo, Ohkawa, Kazuyoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 01.02.2023
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Aim To investigate the outcomes in eight Japanese patients with cancer treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment‐induced severe immune‐related hepatitis (ir‐hepatitis) and the efficacy and safety of MMF. Methods We retrospectively examined patient background, treatment course, as well as examination and imaging data using electronic medical records. Results The ratio of male to female patients was 7:1, and the median age was 60 years (27–72 years). There were five and two cases of kidney cancer and malignant melanoma, respectively, and one case of lung cancer. The median number of days until MMF administration in addition to systemic corticosteroid therapy after the onset of ir‐hepatitis was 14.5 (2–42). The patients were categorized as four “good responders” who showed an improvement in the liver function tests following MMF treatment and four “poor responders” who did not. Furthermore, the time from the onset of ir‐hepatitis to initial MMF administration was significantly shorter in good responders (median 3 days, range 2–15 days) than in poor responders (median 25.5 days, range 14–42 days) (P = 0.042). No significant intergroup difference was observed in other clinical factors. No serious adverse events caused by MMF were observed in any case. Conclusions According to these findings, early recognition of corticosteroid refractoriness and the use of MMF may be beneficial in patients with ir‐hepatitis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for eight Japanese patients with cancer treated with MMF and corticosteroids for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment‐induced severe immune‐related hepatitis. The duration from the onset of immune‐related hepatitis (ir‐hepatitis) to initial MMF administration was significantly shorter in good responders than in poor responders (P = 0.042). Early recognition of steroid refractoriness and the usage of MMF may be beneficial in patients with ir‐hepatitis.
Bibliography:Author contribution
This study received no external funding.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Declaration of conflict of interest
Financial support
Mari Takagi, Satoko Inoue, Akitoshi Tatsumi, Mayako Uchida, Keiko Fujita, Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa established comprehensive research goals and aims and developed and designed methodologies. Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa provided patient samples. Yukio Kadokawa, Mari Takagi, Satoko Inoue, Keiko Fujita, Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa performed the experiments, collected data, and conducted administrative activities to maintain the survey data. Yukio Kadokawa and Keiko Fujita conducted data analysis. Yukio Kadokawa drafted the manuscript with the help of Akitoshi Tatsumi, Mayako Uchida, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa. Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, and Kazuo Nishimura assessed the authenticity of all the raw data to ensure their legitimacy. Mari Takagi, Satoko Inoue, Akitoshi Tatsumi, Mayako Uchida, Keiko Fujita, Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa conducted critical reviews, visualizations, and edits. Keiko Fujita, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa were responsible for oversight and leadership in planning and carrying out research activities. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work and ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Declaration of conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Financial support: This study received no external funding.
Author contribution: Mari Takagi, Satoko Inoue, Akitoshi Tatsumi, Mayako Uchida, Keiko Fujita, Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa established comprehensive research goals and aims and developed and designed methodologies. Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa provided patient samples. Yukio Kadokawa, Mari Takagi, Satoko Inoue, Keiko Fujita, Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa performed the experiments, collected data, and conducted administrative activities to maintain the survey data. Yukio Kadokawa and Keiko Fujita conducted data analysis. Yukio Kadokawa drafted the manuscript with the help of Akitoshi Tatsumi, Mayako Uchida, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa. Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Tomoyuki Otsuka, and Kazuo Nishimura assessed the authenticity of all the raw data to ensure their legitimacy. Mari Takagi, Satoko Inoue, Akitoshi Tatsumi, Mayako Uchida, Keiko Fujita, Takako Inoue, Shuichi Ohe, Yasutomo Nakai, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, Taiki Isei, Toru Kumagai, Kazuo Nishimura, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa conducted critical reviews, visualizations, and edits. Keiko Fujita, Yutaro Abe, Tasuku Nakabori, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa were responsible for oversight and leadership in planning and carrying out research activities. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work and ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
ISSN:2397-9070
2397-9070
DOI:10.1002/jgh3.12868