Dynamic EEG-informed fMRI modeling of the pain matrix using 20-ms root mean square segments

Previous studies on the spatio‐temporal dynamics of cortical pain processing using electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), or intracranial recordings point towards a high degree of parallelism, e.g. parallel instead of sequential activation of primary and secondary somatosensory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 31; no. 11; pp. 1702 - 1712
Main Authors Brinkmeyer, Juergen, Mobascher, Arian, Warbrick, Tracy, Musso, Francesco, Wittsack, Hans-Jörg, Saleh, Andreas, Schnitzler, Alfons, Winterer, Georg
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.11.2010
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI10.1002/hbm.20967

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies on the spatio‐temporal dynamics of cortical pain processing using electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), or intracranial recordings point towards a high degree of parallelism, e.g. parallel instead of sequential activation of primary and secondary somatosensory areas or simultaneous activation of somatosensory areas and the mid‐cingulate cortex. However, because of the inverse problem, EEG and MEG provide only limited spatial resolution and certainty about the generators of cortical pain‐induced electromagnetic activity, especially when multiple sources are simultaneously active. On the other hand, intracranial recordings are invasive and do not provide whole‐brain coverage. In this study, we thought to investigate the spatio‐temporal dynamics of cortical pain processing in 10 healthy subjects using simultaneous EEG/functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Voltages of 20 ms segments of the EEG root mean square (a global, largely reference‐free measure of event‐related EEG activity) in a time window 0–400 ms poststimulus were used to model trial‐to‐trial fluctuations in the fMRI blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. EEG‐derived regressors explained additional variance in the BOLD signal from 140 ms poststimulus onward. According to this analysis, the contralateral parietal operculum was the first cortical area to become activated upon painful laser stimulation. The activation pattern in BOLD analyses informed by subsequent EEG‐time windows suggests largely parallel signal processing in the bilateral operculo‐insular and mid‐cingulate cortices. In that regard, our data are in line with previous reports. However, the approach presented here is noninvasive and bypasses the inverse problem using only temporal information from the EEG. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-S0M4VB6H-7
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
ArticleID:HBM20967
istex:AC0E7AAA8B0B1B6ED201A4F504E0709075BDC063
Juergen Brinkmeyer and Arian Mobascher contributed equally to this work.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.20967