Effects of lighting variability on locomotion in posterior cortical atrophy

• Published in: Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions Vol. 6; no. 1; pp. e12077 - n/a
• Main Authors: Yong, Keir X. X., McCarthy, Ian D., Poole, Teresa, Ocal, Dilek, Suzuki, Ayako, Suzuki, Tatsuto, Mengoudi, Kyriaki, Papadosifos, Nikolaos, Boampong, Derrick, Tyler, Nick, Frost, Chris, Crutch, Sebastian J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2020; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease; Atrophy; Blindness; Dementia; Experiments; Flooring; Laboratories; Lighting; locomotion; Memory; Neuropsychology; Patients; posterior cortical atrophy; Visual impairment; visual perception; posterior cortical atrophy; dementia; visual perception; Alzheimer's disease; locomotion
• ISSN: 2352-8737; 2352-8737
• DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12077

Introduction Clinical reports describe patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) exhibiting atypical adaptive walking responses to the visual environment; however, there is limited empirical investigation of such behaviors or factors modulating their expression. We aim to evaluate effects of lighting‐based interventions and clinical presentation (visual‐ vs memory‐led) on walking function in participants with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and typical AD (tAD). Methods Participants with PCA (n = 10), tAD (n = 9), and healthy controls (n = 12) walked to visible target destinations under different lighting conditions within two pilot repeated‐measures design investigations (Experiment 1: 32 trials per participant; Experiment 2: 36 trials per participant). Participants walked to destinations with the floorpath interrupted by shadows varying in spatial extent (Experiment 1: no, medium, high shadow) or with different localized parts of the environment illuminated (Experiment 2: target, middle, or distractor illuminated). The primary study outcome for both experimental tasks was completion time; secondary kinematic outcomes were proportions of steps identified as outliers (Experiment 1) and walking path directness (Experiment 2). Results In Experiment 1, PCA participants overall demonstrated modest reductions in time taken to reach destinations when walking to destinations uninterrupted by shadows compared to high shadow conditions (7.1% reduction [95% confidence interval 2.5, 11.5; P = .003]). Experiment 2 found no evidence of differences in task performance for different localized lighting conditions in PCA participants overall. Neither experiment found evidence of differences in task performance between conditions in tAD or control participants overall. Completion time in both patient groups was longer relative to controls, and longer in PCA relative to tAD groups. Discussion Findings represent a quantitative characterization of a clinical phenomenon involving patients misperceiving shadows, implicating dementia‐related cortico‐visual impairments. Results contribute to evidence‐based design guidelines for dementia‐friendly environments.