Concordant Occipital and Supraorbital Neurostimulation Therapy for Hemiplegic Migraine; Initial Experience; A Case Series

Introduction Hemiplegic migraine is a particularly severe form of the disease that often evolves to a debilitating chronic illness that is resistant to commonly available therapies. Peripheral neurostimulation has been found to be a beneficial therapy for some patients among several diagnostic class...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuromodulation (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 297 - 304
Main Authors Reed, Ken L., Will, Kelly R., Conidi, Frank, Bulger, Robert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2015
Elsevier Limited
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Hemiplegic migraine is a particularly severe form of the disease that often evolves to a debilitating chronic illness that is resistant to commonly available therapies. Peripheral neurostimulation has been found to be a beneficial therapy for some patients among several diagnostic classes of migraine, but its potential has not been specifically evaluated for hemiplegic migraine. Materials and Methods Four patients with hemiplegic migraine were treated with concordant, combined occipital and supraorbital neurostimulation over periods ranging 6–92 months. The clinical indicators followed included assessments of headache frequency and severity, frequency of hemiplegic episodes, functional impairment, medication usage, and patient satisfaction. Results All reported a positive therapeutic response, as their average headache frequency decreased by 92% (30 to 2.5 headache days/month); Visual Analog Score by 44% (9.5 to 5.3); frequency of hemiplegic episodes by 96% (7.5 to 0.25 hemiplegic episodes/month); headache medication usage by 96% (6 to 0.25 daily medications); and Migraine Disability Assessment score by 98% (249 to 6). All were satisfied and would recommend the therapy, and all preferred combined occipital–supraorbital neurostimulation to occipital neurostimulation alone. Conclusions Concordant combined occipital and supraorbital neurostimulation may provide effective therapy for both the pain and motor aura in some patients with hemiplegic migraine.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-913FJWRC-R
istex:B9A18DB21CFB0FDCC5D2C2E62715587C7450C093
ArticleID:NER12267
ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit.asp?ref=1094‐7159&site=1
Conflict of Interest: Dr. Reed has served as a paid consultant for St. Jude Medical and is a co‐investigator in St. Jude Medical's studies evaluating occipital nerve stimulation for migraine headaches. Dr. Will has served as a paid consultant for St. Jude Medical. No advice, direction, or assistance (financial or otherwise) was received for this study. Drs. Reed, Bulger, and Will report no conflicts other than stated above. Dr. Conidi reports no conflicts.
ISSN:1094-7159
1525-1403
DOI:10.1111/ner.12267