Model‐based meta‐analysis of changes in circulatory system physiology in patients with chronic heart failure

To characterize and compare various medicines for chronic heart failure (CHF), changes in circulatory physiological parameter during pharmacotherapy were investigated by a model‐based meta‐analysis (MBMA) of circulatory physiology. The clinical data from 61 studies mostly in patients with heart fail...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCPT: pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology Vol. 10; no. 9; pp. 1081 - 1091
Main Authors Takaoka, Ryota, Soejima, Yukako, Guro, Sayuri, Yoshioka, Hideki, Sato, Hiromi, Suzuki, Hiroshi, Hisaka, Akihiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.09.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To characterize and compare various medicines for chronic heart failure (CHF), changes in circulatory physiological parameter during pharmacotherapy were investigated by a model‐based meta‐analysis (MBMA) of circulatory physiology. The clinical data from 61 studies mostly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), reporting changes in heart rate, blood pressure, or ventricular volumes after treatment with carvedilol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, bucindolol, enalapril, aliskiren, or felodipine, were analyzed. Seven cardiac and vasculature function indices were estimated without invasive measurements using models based on appropriate assumptions, and their correlations with the mortality were assessed. Estimated myocardial oxygen consumption, a cardiac load index, correlated excellently with the mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation, and it explained differences in mortality across the different medications. The analysis based on the present models were reasonably consistent with the hypothesis that the treatment of HFrEF with various medications is due to effectively reducing the cardiac load. Assessment of circulatory physiological parameters by using MBMA would be insightful for quantitative understanding of CHF treatment.
Bibliography:Funding information
This study was partly supported by AMED under Grant Number JP20mk0101159.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:2163-8306
2163-8306
DOI:10.1002/psp4.12676