Evaluation of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radical Esophagectomy in Clinical T1bN0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

• Published in: World journal of surgery Vol. 45; no. 6; pp. 1835 - 1844
• Main Authors: Haneda, Ryoma, Booka, Eisuke, Ishii, Kenjiro, Kikuchi, Hirotoshi, Hiramatsu, Yoshihiro, Kamiya, Kinji, Ogawa, Hirofumi, Yasui, Hirofumi, Takeuchi, Hiroya, Tsubosa, Yasuhiro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.06.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Cardiac Surgery; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Confidence intervals; Disease control; Esophageal cancer; Esophagus; Gastrointestinal surgery; General Surgery; Health services; Medical prognosis; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Scientific Report; Patients; Photodynamic therapy; Prognosis; Radiation therapy; Squamous cell carcinoma; Surgery; Survival; Thoracic Surgery; Vascular Surgery
• ISSN: 0364-2313; 1432-2323
• DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06016-4

Background The standard treatment for patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is radical esophagectomy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is regarded as a treatment option, and recently, good clinical outcomes of this treatment have been reported. This study compared prognosis after definitive chemoradiotherapy with radical esophagectomy. Methods From January 2011 to December 2019, 68 consecutive patients who were diagnosed clinical T1bN0M0 squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled and investigated retrospectively. Patients were classified into two groups whether treated by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy. Survival outcomes were compared, and subsequent therapies after recurrence were also investigated. Results Among 68 patients, 39 patients underwent surgery and 29 patients received definitive chemoradiotherapy. No significant difference was noted in overall survival between the two groups. However, the rate of 5-year recurrence-free survival was significantly lower in definitive chemoradiotherapy group than that of surgery group (91.1 vs. 62.7%, hazard ratio 3.976, 95% confidence interval 1.076–14.696, p  = 0.039). Patients who had local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy received endoscopic submucosal dissection or photodynamic therapy as salvage therapies, which resulted in no disease progression and a good prognosis. Conclusions Definitive chemoradiotherapy may become a promising alternative therapy comparable with radical esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Early detection of recurrence by frequent follow-up after definitive chemoradiotherapy is important to control disease within local recurrence, and salvage therapy for local lesions could contribute to long-term survival.