Morbidity following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: A randomized trial
Aim To comparatively evaluate the morbidity following maxillary sinus floor elevation according to either transcrestal (tSFE) or lateral (lSFE) approach with concomitant implant placement. Materials & Methods Patients with ≥1 edentulous maxillary posterior site with residual bone height (RBH) of...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 45; no. 9; pp. 1128 - 1139 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2018
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aim
To comparatively evaluate the morbidity following maxillary sinus floor elevation according to either transcrestal (tSFE) or lateral (lSFE) approach with concomitant implant placement.
Materials & Methods
Patients with ≥1 edentulous maxillary posterior site with residual bone height (RBH) of 3–6 mm were enrolled. tSFE was performed in association with a xenograft and a collagen matrix. For lSFE, the sinus was grafted with the xenograft, and the antrostomy was covered with a membrane. Implants were inserted concomitantly. The postoperative course was assessed through questionnaires. Pain level (VASpain) was recorded using a 100‐mm visual analogue scale.
Results
Twenty‐nine and 28 patients were included in tSFE and lSFE group, respectively. On the day of surgery, VASpain was significantly higher for tSFE compared to lSFE, and similar from day 1 to 14. tSFE was characterized by significantly lower incidence of swelling, bruising and nasal discharge/bleeding. Significantly less severe limitation in swallowing, continuing daily activities, eating, speaking, opening the mouth and going to school/work was found for tSFE only at specific postsurgery intervals.
Conclusions
lSFE was associated with lower pain on the day of surgery, and tSFE revealed lower postoperative morbidity as well as more tolerable postoperative course. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information The study was supported by a research grant by Regione Emilia‐Romagna Programma di Ricerca Regione‐Università Area 1 “Ricerca Innovativa” Bando Giovani Ricercatori “Alessandro Liberati”’ 2013; project PRUA1GR‐2013‐00000168, and by a research grant of the Osteology Foundation, Lucerne, Switzerland (project #13‐063). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02415946 |
ISSN: | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpe.12985 |