Surgical publication activity in the English literature over a 10‐year interval

• Published in: BJS open Vol. 3; no. 5; pp. 696 - 703
• Main Authors: Hinrichs, D. L., Debus, E. S., Grundmann, R. T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.10.2019; Oxford University Press
• Subjects: Bibliometrics; Editorials; Impact factors; Original; Researchers; Studies; Surgery; Trends; Sweden; Netherlands; United States > US; Switzerland; Germany
• ISSN: 2474-9842; 2474-9842
• DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50172

Background Surgical publication activity in the English literature over a 10‐year interval may have changed. This study sought to identify which countries make the most contributions and whether significant shifts have occurred in this time. Methods Screening of 17 international journals in PubMed was performed for the time periods 2006–2007 and 2016–2017, for papers published by a first author belonging to a general surgical department. Data were collected by country regarding the total number of publications, cumulative impact factors (IFs), publications per inhabitant, IFs per inhabitant, and number of RCTs, meta‐analyses and systematic reviews per country in both periods. Results A total of 2247 and 3029 papers were found for 2006–2007 and 2016–2017 respectively. In 2006–2007, most papers (605, 26·9 per cent; 2697·3 IFs) came from the USA, followed by Japan (284, 12·6 per cent; 1042·1 IFs) and the UK (197, 8·8 per cent; 923·1 IFs). In 2016–2017, the USA led again with 898 papers (29·6 per cent; 4575·3 IFs), followed by Japan with 414 papers (13·7 per cent; 1556·6 IFs) and the Netherlands with 167 (5·5 per cent; 885·2 IFs). From the top 15 countries, Sweden, the Netherlands and Switzerland contributed the most articles per inhabitant during both time periods. During both periods, the UK published the most RCTs, meta‐analyses and systematic reviews. Conclusion Surgeons from the USA were the most productive in total number of publications during both time periods. However, smaller European countries were more active than the USA in relation to their population size. This study addresses international publication activity in general surgery over a 10‐year interval. It clarifies which countries made the most contributions and whether there were any changes between 2006–2007 and 2016–2017. Clear evidence of change