Non-hyperbolic time inconsistency

The commonly used hyperbolic and quasi-hyperbolic discount functions have been developed to accommodate decreasing impatience, which is the prevailing empirical finding in intertemporal choice, in particular for aggregate behavior. However, these discount functions do not have the flexibility to acc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGames and economic behavior Vol. 66; no. 1; pp. 27 - 38
Main Authors Bleichrodt, Han, Rohde, Kirsten I.M., Wakker, Peter P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Duluth Elsevier Inc 01.05.2009
Elsevier
Academic Press
SeriesGames and Economic Behavior
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The commonly used hyperbolic and quasi-hyperbolic discount functions have been developed to accommodate decreasing impatience, which is the prevailing empirical finding in intertemporal choice, in particular for aggregate behavior. However, these discount functions do not have the flexibility to accommodate increasing impatience or strongly decreasing impatience. This lack of flexibility is particularly disconcerting for fitting data at the individual level, where various patterns of increasing impatience and strongly decreasing impatience will occur for a significant fraction of subjects. This paper presents discount functions with constant absolute (CADI) or constant relative (CRDI) decreasing impatience that can accommodate any degree of decreasing or increasing impatience. In particular, they are sufficiently flexible for analyses at the individual level. The CADI and CRDI discount functions are the analogs of the well-known CARA and CRRA utility functions for decision under risk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0899-8256
1090-2473
DOI:10.1016/j.geb.2008.05.007