Impaired neural response to negative prediction errors in cocaine addiction

Learning can be guided by unexpected success or failure, signaled via dopaminergic positive reward prediction error (+RPE) and negative reward-prediction error (-RPE) signals, respectively. Despite conflicting empirical evidence, RPE signaling is thought to be impaired in drug addiction. To resolve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 1872 - 1879
Main Authors Parvaz, Muhammad A, Konova, Anna B, Proudfit, Greg H, Dunning, Jonathan P, Malaker, Pias, Moeller, Scott J, Maloney, Tom, Alia-Klein, Nelly, Goldstein, Rita Z
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 04.02.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Learning can be guided by unexpected success or failure, signaled via dopaminergic positive reward prediction error (+RPE) and negative reward-prediction error (-RPE) signals, respectively. Despite conflicting empirical evidence, RPE signaling is thought to be impaired in drug addiction. To resolve this outstanding question, we studied as a measure of RPE the feedback negativity (FN) that is sensitive to both reward and the violation of expectation. We examined FN in 25 healthy controls; 25 individuals with cocaine-use disorder (CUD) who tested positive for cocaine on the study day (CUD+), indicating cocaine use within the past 72 h; and in 25 individuals with CUD who tested negative for cocaine (CUD-). EEG was acquired while the participants performed a gambling task predicting whether they would win or lose money on each trial given three known win probabilities (25, 50, or 75%). FN was scored for the period in each trial when the actual outcome (win or loss) was revealed. A significant interaction between prediction, outcome, and group revealed that controls showed increased FN to unpredicted compared with predicted wins (i.e., intact +RPE) and decreased FN to unpredicted compared with predicted losses (i.e., intact -RPE). However, neither CUD subgroup showed FN modulation to loss (i.e., impaired -RPE), and unlike CUD+ individuals, CUD- individuals also did not show FN modulation to win (i.e., impaired +RPE). Thus, using FN, the current study directly documents -RPE deficits in CUD individuals. The mechanisms underlying -RPE signaling impairments in addiction may contribute to the disadvantageous nature of excessive drug use, which can persist despite repeated unfavorable life experiences (e.g., frequent incarcerations).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: M.A.P., G.H.P., N.A.-K., and R.Z.G. designed research; M.A.P., A.B.K., J.P.D., P.M., and T.M. performed research; M.A.P., A.B.K., J.P.D., and S.J.M. analyzed data; M.A.P. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0270-6474
1529-2401
DOI:10.1523/jneurosci.2777-14.2015