Validation of an Eco-Friendly Automated Method for the Determination of Glucose and Fructose in Wines

• Published in: Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 28; no. 14; p. 5585
• Main Authors: Dini, Irene, Tuccillo, Dario, Coppola, Daniele, De Biasi, Margherita-Gabriella, Morelli, Elena, Mancusi, Andrea
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.07.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Analysis; automated colorimetric test; Automation; Calibration; Dehydrogenases; Dextrose; Expected values; fermentable sugars dosage; Fermentation; food analysis; Fructose; Glucose; Human error; Mechanization; Methods; metrological approach; Random variables; Reagents; Technology application; Wine; Yeast; Israel; fermentable sugars dosage; metrological approach; automated colorimetric test; food analysis
• ISSN: 1420-3049; 1420-3049
• DOI: 10.3390/molecules28145585

Fermentable sugar dosage helps oenologists to establish a harvest's moment and control the fermentation process of the musts. The official analyses recommended for their determination are long, laborious, and must be carried out by specialized personnel. On the contrary, instrumental analysis automation limits human errors, increases precision, and reduces the time and cost of the analyses. In the food production sector, to use methods other than those recommended by supranational bodies in official reports, it is necessary to validate the analytical processes to establish the conformity of the results between the new methods and the reference ones. This work validated an automated enzymatic apparatus to determine the sum of glucose and fructose levels in wine samples. The validation was carried out on wine samples (dry red wine, dry white wine, moderately sweet wine, and sweet wine) containing different sugar concentrations by comparing data obtained using the OIV-MA-AS311-02 method performed by a specialized operator (reference method) and the same method performed by an automated apparatus. The difference between the results' means obtained with the two procedures was significant. Nevertheless, the automated procedure was considered suitable for the intended use since the differences between the averages were lower than the measurement uncertainty at the same concentration, and the repeatability results were better for the automated procedure than the reference method.