Global prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: To determine the global prevalence and common causes of visual impairment (VI) and blindness in children. Methods: In this meta-analysis, a structured search strategy was applied to search electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as the list of references i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIranian journal of ophthalmology Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 1 - 15
Main Authors Yekta, Abbasali, Hooshmand, Elham, Saatchi, Mohammad, Ostadimoghaddam, Hadi, Asharlous, Amir, Taheri, Azadeh, Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01.01.2022
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: To determine the global prevalence and common causes of visual impairment (VI) and blindness in children. Methods: In this meta-analysis, a structured search strategy was applied to search electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as the list of references in the selected articles to identify all population-based cross-sectional studies that concerned the prevalence of VI and blindness in populations under 20 years of age up to January 2018, regardless of the publication date and language, gender, region of residence, or race. VI was reported based on presenting visual acuity (PVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of equal to 20/60 or worse in the better eye. Blindness was reported as visual acuity worse than 20/400 in the better eye. Results: In the present study, 5711 articles were identified, and the final analyses were done on 80 articles including 769,720 people from twenty-eight different countries. The prevalence of VI based on UCVA was 7.26% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.34%-10.19%), PVA was 3.82% (95% CI: 2.06%-5.57%), BCVA was 1.67% (95% CI 0.97%-2.37%), and blindness was 0.17% (95% CI: 0.13%-0.21%). Refractive errors were the most common cause of VI in the subjects of selected articles (77.20% [95% CI: 73.40%-81.00%]). The prevalence of amblyopia was 7.60% (95% CI: 05.60%-09.10%) and congenital cataract was 0.60% (95% CI: 0.3%-0.9%). Conclusion: Despite differences in the definition of VI and blindness, based on PVA, 3.82%, and based on BCVA, 1.67% of the examined samples suffer from VI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2452-2325
2452-2325
DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_135_21