Nectar robbing by bees affects the reproductive fitness of the distylous plant Tirpitzia sinensis (Linaceae)

• Published in: Ecology and evolution Vol. 13; no. 11; pp. e10714 - n/a
• Main Authors: Wang, Xiaoyue, Yao, Renxiu, Lv, Xiaoqin, Yi, Yin, Tang, Xiaoxin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2023; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Animal reproduction; Biodiversity Ecology; Breeding success; defense strategies; Diameters; distyly; Evolution; Females; Fitness; Flowers; Flowers & plants; Germination; Herbivores; Males; Metabolites; Nectar; nectar robbing; plant fitness; Plant nectar; Plant reproduction; Plants (botany); Pollen; Pollinators; Reproduction; Reproductive fitness; reproductive success; Robbing behavior; Secondary metabolites; Seed set; Sepals; Sugar; China; defense strategies; plant fitness; nectar robbing; distyly; reproductive success
• ISSN: 2045-7758; 2045-7758
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10714

Nectar robbing can affect plant reproductive success directly by influencing female and male fitness, and indirectly by affecting pollinator behavior. Flowers have morphological and chemical features that may protect them from nectar robbers. Previous studies on nectar robbing have focused mainly on homotypic plants. It remains unclear how nectar robbing affects the reproductive success of distylous plants, and whether defense strategies of two morphs are different. Nectar‐robbing rates on the long‐ and short‐styled morph (L‐morph, S‐morph) of the distylous Tirpitzia sinensis were investigated. We compared floral traits, the temporal pattern of change in nectar volume and sugar concentration, nectar secondary metabolites, and sugar composition between robbed and unrobbed flowers of two morphs. We tested direct effects of nectar robbing on female and male components of plant fitness and indirect effects of nectar robbing via pollinators. Nectar‐robbing rates did not differ between the two morphs. Flowers with smaller sepals and petals were more easily robbed. The floral tube diameter and thickness were greater in L‐morphs than in S‐morphs, and the nectar rob holes were significantly smaller in L‐morphs than in S‐morphs. Nectar robbing significantly decreased nectar replenishment rate but did not affect nectar sugar concentration or sugar composition. After robbery, the quantities and diversity of secondary compounds in the nectar of S‐morphs increased significantly and total relative contents of secondary compounds in L‐morphs showed no obvious changes. Nectar robbing could decrease female fitness by decreasing pollen germination rate and thus decreasing seed set. Nectar robbing had no significant effects on male fitness. Robbed flowers were less likely to be visited by hawkmoth pollinators, especially in S‐morphs. These results suggest that nectar robbing could directly and indirectly decrease the female fitness of T. sinensis, and different morphs have evolved different defense mechanisms in response to nectar‐robbing pressure. Nectar robbing could directly and indirectly decrease the female fitness of Tirpitzia sinensis, and different morphs have evolved different defense mechanisms in response to nectar robbing pressure.