Precautionary Regulation in Europe and the United States: A Quantitative Comparison

• Published in: Risk analysis Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 1215 - 1228
• Main Authors: Hammitt, James K., Wiener, Jonathan B., Swedlow, Brendon, Kall, Denise, Zhou, Zheng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA , and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , UK Blackwell Publishing, Inc 01.10.2005; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: and safety regulation; Comparative analysis; Comparative regulation; environmental; Environmental policy; Environmental regulations; environmental, health, and safety regulation; health; Health risk assessment; Hypotheses; precautionary principle; Regulation; regulatory stringency; Risk management; Studies; Trends; United States > US; Europe; USA
• ISSN: 0272-4332; 1539-6924
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00662.x

Much attention has been addressed to the question of whether Europe or the United States adopts a more precautionary stance to the regulation of potential environmental, health, and safety risks. Some commentators suggest that Europe is more risk‐averse and precautionary, whereas the United States is seen as more risk‐taking and optimistic about the prospects for new technology. Others suggest that the United States is more precautionary because its regulatory process is more legalistic and adversarial, while Europe is more lax and corporatist in its regulations. The flip‐flop hypothesis claims that the United States was more precautionary than Europe in the 1970s and early 1980s, and that Europe has become more precautionary since then. We examine the levels and trends in regulation of environmental, health, and safety risks since 1970. Unlike previous research, which has studied only a small set of prominent cases selected nonrandomly, we develop a comprehensive list of almost 3,000 risks and code the relative stringency of regulation in Europe and the United States for each of 100 risks randomly selected from that list for each year from 1970 through 2004. Our results suggest that: (a) averaging over risks, there is no significant difference in relative precaution over the period, (b) weakly consistent with the flip‐flop hypothesis, there is some evidence of a modest shift toward greater relative precaution of European regulation since about 1990, although (c) there is a diversity of trends across risks, of which the most common is no change in relative precaution (including cases where Europe and the United States are equally precautionary and where Europe or the United States has been consistently more precautionary). The overall finding is of a mixed and diverse pattern of relative transatlantic precaution over the period.