The presence of a helix breaker in the hydrophobic core of signal sequences of secretory proteins prevents recognition by the signal‐recognition particle in Escherichia coli

Signal sequences often contain α‐helix‐destabilizing amino acids within the hydrophobic core. In the precursor of the Escherichia coli outer‐membrane protein PhoE, the glycine residue at position −10 (Gly−10) is thought to be responsible for the break in the α‐helix. Previously, we showed that subst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of biochemistry Vol. 269; no. 22; pp. 5564 - 5571
Main Authors Adams, Hendrik, Scotti, Pier A., de Cock, Hans, Luirink, Joen, Tommassen, Jan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.11.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Signal sequences often contain α‐helix‐destabilizing amino acids within the hydrophobic core. In the precursor of the Escherichia coli outer‐membrane protein PhoE, the glycine residue at position −10 (Gly−10) is thought to be responsible for the break in the α‐helix. Previously, we showed that substitution of Gly−10 by α‐helix‐promoting residues (Ala, Cys or Leu) reduced the proton‐motive force dependency of the translocation of the precursor, but the actual role of the helix breaker remained obscure. Here, we considered the possibility that extension of the α‐helical structure in the signal sequence resulting from the Gly−10 substitutions affects the targeting pathway of the precursor. Indeed, the mutations resulted in reduced dependency on SecB for targeting in vivo. In vitro cross‐linking experiments revealed that the G‐10L and G‐10C mutant PhoE precursors had a dramatically increased affinity for P48, one of the constituents of the signal‐recognition particle (SRP). Furthermore, in vitro cross‐linking experiments revealed that the G‐10L mutant protein is routed to the SecYEG translocon via the SRP pathway, the targeting pathway that is exploited by integral inner‐membrane proteins. Together, these data indicate that the helix breaker in cleavable signal sequences prevents recognition by SRP and is thereby, together with the hydrophobicity of the signal sequence, a determinant of the targeting pathway.
Bibliography:IECB‐École polytechnique ENSCPB, Talence cedex, France.
Present address
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0014-2956
1432-1033
DOI:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03262.x